Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768

2020-06-29 Thread Joseph Salowey
is TLV were reused. If we are going to change the TLV/protocol version we could revisit this and other aspects of the compound TLV to validate their security goals and implementation. > > Thanks > Oleg > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:29 PM Jorge Vergara > wrote: > >> >

Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata

2020-06-29 Thread Oleg Pekar
I am > not sure I follow this but if you believe this is needed for the resolution > of this errata I would like to better understand why. > > > > Thanks, > > Jorge > > > > *From:* Emu *On Behalf Of * Oleg Pekar > *Sent:* Sunday, May 3, 2020 10:02 AM > *To:

Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768

2020-06-29 Thread Oleg Pekar
0 at 12:29 PM Jorge Vergara wrote: > > > *From:* Joseph Salowey > *Sent:* Monday, May 25, 2020 9:27 PM > *To:* Jorge Vergara > *Cc:* Oleg Pekar ; Jouni Malinen ; > EMU WG > *Subject:* Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768 > > > > > > > &g

Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768

2020-05-26 Thread Jorge Vergara
From: Joseph Salowey Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 9:27 PM To: Jorge Vergara Cc: Oleg Pekar ; Jouni Malinen ; EMU WG Subject: Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768 On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:18 PM Jorge Vergara mailto:40microsoft@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: My review of this erra

Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768

2020-05-25 Thread Joseph Salowey
etween similar crypto binding implementations in other protocols such as EAP-FAST. I don't think there is much ambiguity here, but I am OK with including 0x37 in the description. > > > Thanks, > > Jorge > > > > *From:* Emu *On Behalf Of * Oleg Pekar > *Sen

Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata

2020-05-22 Thread Jorge Vergara
a I would like to better understand why. Thanks, Jorge From: Emu On Behalf Of Oleg Pekar Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 10:02 AM To: Jouni Malinen ; EMU WG Subject: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata Hi Jouni, You filed Errata ID: 5767, 5844, 5845 regarding sending of Intermediate-Result TLV. Can we

Re: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768

2020-05-22 Thread Jorge Vergara
. Thanks, Jorge From: Emu On Behalf Of Oleg Pekar Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 6:27 AM To: Jouni Malinen ; EMU WG Subject: [Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768 Hi Jouni, I propose the following fix for the issues described in this errata id: 1) In Section "4.2.13. Crypto-Binding TLV"

[Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata ID 5768

2020-05-05 Thread Oleg Pekar
Hi Jouni, I propose the following fix for the issues described in this errata id: 1) In Section "4.2.13. Crypto-Binding TLV" make "EMSK Compound MAC" and "MSK Compound MAC" fields 32 octets long (currently 20 octets). The MAC value is truncated at 32 octets if it is longer than 32 octets or padded

[Emu] TEAP - RFC 7170 - Errata

2020-05-03 Thread Oleg Pekar
Hi Jouni, You filed Errata ID: 5767, 5844, 5845 regarding sending of Intermediate-Result TLV. Can we clarify a general scheme of sending Intermediate-Result TLV and Crypto-Binding TLV in all cases? It is not exactly clear what is "EAP authentication method" and what is its different from "EAP metho