Hi,
I found that we have a ovirt-engine/frontend/api/genericapi project, which is
for my opinion is not at use any more.
If there are any reason that we want to keep it , maybe someone using it and I
missed these?
Thanks Michael
___
Engine-devel maili
On 06/10/2012 11:23 AM, Michael Kublin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that we have a ovirt-engine/frontend/api/genericapi project, which is
> for my opinion is not at use any more.
> If there are any reason that we want to keep it , maybe someone using it and
> I missed these?
IIUC, this was served i
On 06/10/2012 11:23 AM, Michael Kublin wrote:
Hi,
I found that we have a ovirt-engine/frontend/api/genericapi project, which is
for my opinion is not at use any more.
If there are any reason that we want to keep it , maybe someone using it and I
missed these?
Thanks Michael
__
we don't use GetUserActionGroups (it's an unreachable code - can be deleted),
IMHO we can remove the project.
Thanks,
Gilad.
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Michael Kublin"
> Cc: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:48:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel]
We may want to wait for the removal of the deprecated uicommon project (which
is in use by the old UserPortal).
uicommonweb doesn't use UiQueries any more (it's not depended on the genericapi
project) - so I think it can be removed.
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Mic
On 06/10/2012 12:33 PM, Daniel Erez wrote:
We may want to wait for the removal of the deprecated uicommon project (which
is in use by the old UserPortal).
uicommonweb doesn't use UiQueries any more (it's not depended on the genericapi
project) - so I think it can be removed.
I'd wait to see i
At least meanwhile, can I disable loading of GenericApiService bean during
start up of jboss?
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Heim"
To: "Daniel Erez"
Cc: "engine-devel" , "Michael Kublin"
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 12:44:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Do we need genericApi proj
IIUC originally this collection was suppose to keep all disks
that can be shared between different vms and/or available to be
attached to certain vm.
At the moment this collection contains all disks in system while
engine does not provide any search capabilities for it,
in my view it not really
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Pasternak"
> To: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 4:18:14 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] RESTAPI: what is the purpose for /api/disks
> collection
>
>
> IIUC originally this collection was suppose to keep all disks
> that can be shared
On 06/10/2012 05:11 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michael Pasternak"
>> To: "engine-devel"
>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 4:18:14 PM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] RESTAPI: what is the purpose for /api/disks
>> collection
>>
>>
>> IIUC originally this collec
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Pasternak"
> To: "Omer Frenkel"
> Cc: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:27:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] RESTAPI: what is the purpose for /api/disks
> collection
>
> On 06/10/2012 05:11 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
> >
> >
>
On 06/10/2012 05:30 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michael Pasternak"
>> To: "Omer Frenkel"
>> Cc: "engine-devel"
>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:27:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] RESTAPI: what is the purpose for /api/disks
>> collection
>>
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Pasternak"
> To: "Ori Liel"
> Cc: "Omer Frenkel" , "engine-devel"
>
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 6:30:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] RESTAPI: what is the purpose for /api/disks
> collection
>
> On 06/10/2012 05:30 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michael Pasternak"
>> To: "Ori Liel"
>> Cc: "Omer Frenkel" , "engine-devel"
>>
>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 6:30:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] RESTAPI: what is the purpose for /api/disks
>> coll
On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
> if so why it
> appear in /disks?,
> i think root collection /disks should contain only items available
> for common usage.
> (can't see any point in showing private vm disks there (such as
> not-shareable&& not-floating))
i don't think it mak
On 06/10/2012 06:52 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>>> > if so why it
>>> > appear in /disks?,
>>> > i think root collection /disks should contain only items available
>>> > for common usage.
>>> > (can't see any point in showing private vm disks there (su
- Original Message -
> On 06/10/2012 06:52 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
> >>> > if so why it
> >>> > appear in /disks?,
> >>> > i think root collection /disks should contain only items
> >>> > available
> >>> > for common usage.
> >>> > (can
On 06/10/2012 11:49 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 06/10/2012 06:52 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2012 06:35 PM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
>> if so why it
>> appear in /disks?,
>> i think root collection /disks should contain only items
>> avail
18 matches
Mail list logo
