Dear engine-core maintainers,
I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various
areas in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than 200 patches
merged to engine master alone. Tons of mi
On 30.01.14 09:47, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
> Dear engine-core maintainers,
> I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
>
> Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various
> areas in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than 2
On Thu 30 Jan 2014 10:52:33 AM IST, Shahar Havivi wrote:
On 30.01.14 09:47, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
Dear engine-core maintainers,
I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various areas
in engine
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Itamar Heim" , "Livnat Peer" , "Omer
> Frenkel" , "Doron
> Fediuck" , "Yair Zaslavsky" , "Maor
> Lipchuk" , "Roy
> Golan" , "Eli Mesika" , "Mike
> Kolesnik" , "Moti Asayag"
> , "Shahar Havivi" , ov...@redhat.com,
> "Allon Mureini
> Subject: [Engine-devel] proposing Arik Hadas as a maintainer of engine core
>
> Dear engine-core maintainers,
> I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
>
> Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various
> areas in engine core, demons
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Betak"
> To: "Michal Skrivanek"
> Cc: ov...@redhat.com, engine-devel@ovirt.org, in...@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:32:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] proposing Arik Hadas as a maintainer of engine
> core
>
> > Subject: [Eng
On 01/30/2014 10:47 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
Dear engine-core maintainers,
I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various areas
in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than 200
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Itamar Heim" , "Livnat Peer" , "Omer
> Frenkel" , "Doron
> Fediuck" , "Yair Zaslavsky" , "Maor
> Lipchuk" , "Roy
> Golan" , "Eli Mesika" , "Mike
> Kolesnik" , "Moti Asayag"
> , "Shahar Havivi" , ov...@redhat.com,
> "Allon Murei
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Itamar Heim" , "Livnat Peer" , "Omer
> Frenkel" , "Doron
> Fediuck" , "Yair Zaslavsky" , "Maor
> Lipchuk" , "Roy
> Golan" , "Eli Mesika" , "Mike
> Kolesnik" , "Moti Asayag"
> , "Shahar Havivi" , ov...@redhat.com,
> "Allon Mureini
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Eli Mesika"
> To: "Michal Skrivanek"
> Cc: ov...@redhat.com, engine-devel@ovirt.org, in...@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:56:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] proposing Arik Hadas as a maintainer of engine
> core
>
>
>
> - Or
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Itamar Heim" , "Livnat Peer" , "Omer
> Frenkel" , "Doron
> Fediuck" , "Yair Zaslavsky" , "Maor
> Lipchuk" , "Roy
> Golan" , "Eli Mesika" , "Mike
> Kolesnik" , "Moti Asayag"
> , "Shahar Havivi" , ov...@redhat.com,
> "Allon Mureini
On 01/30/2014 10:47 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
> Dear engine-core maintainers,
> I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
>
> Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various
> areas in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more t
+1!
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Skrivanek"
To: "Itamar Heim" , "Livnat Peer" , "Omer
Frenkel" , "Doron Fediuck" , "Yair
Zaslavsky" , "Maor Lipchuk" , "Roy
Golan" , "Eli Mesika" , "Mike Kolesnik"
, "Moti Asayag" , "Shahar Havivi"
, ov...@redhat.com, "Allon Mureinik"
Cc: engine
Hi,
On the test day I was testing the Fake PPC support. I managed to
register the Fake PPC host into the engine. However when I tried to run
the VM it failed with libvirt responding:
*
libvirtError: internal error: process exited while connecting to
monitor: "kvm" accelerator does not exist.*
Hi,
while trying to add a new message I couldn't help notice some ugliness in the
code regarding our error messages in UI
- why do we have @DefaultStringValue in
frontend/webadmin/modules/frontend/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.java
? All strings are defined in individual
- we used to have a lot of differences between the admin messages
and the user portal messages; unfortunately we lost them somehow,
I can't remember how or when, it was quite a long time ago. so
the fact that the admin and user messages are identical is actually
a bug/regression.
- once the G
On Jan 30, 2014, at 14:52 , Einav Cohen wrote:
> - we used to have a lot of differences between the admin messages
> and the user portal messages; unfortunately we lost them somehow,
> I can't remember how or when, it was quite a long time ago. so
> the fact that the admin and user messages a
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:56:07 AM
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 14:52 , Einav Cohen wrote:
>
> > - we used to have a lot of differences between the admin messages
> > and the user portal messages; unfortunately we lost them some
I'm inclined to drop the "bug-url is required" for engine stable branch
3.4, until we GA 3.4, as a lot of the patches are for pre-GA features.
3.3 stable branch still has this requirement of course.
thoughts anyone?
Thanks,
Itamar
___
Engine-devel
+1
I think it will also speed up the backport of various critical fixes to 3.4
discovered before GA for which there is no BZ created.
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:42:17 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] bug-url requir
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:42:17 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] bug-url requirement for stable branch backports
>
> I'm inclined to drop the "bug-url is required" for engine stable branch
> 3.4, until we GA 3.4, as
I think it will help stabilizing the new features in a short circle,
sometimes there are small "fine tuning" fixes that don't have bugs
opened for them and the flow is easier if you can just backport them
without opening a bug.
On 01/30/2014 04:42 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
I'm inclined to drop th
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:42:17 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] bug-url requirement for stable branch backports
>
> I'm inclined to drop the "bug-url is required" for engine stable branch
> 3.4, until we GA 3.4, as
Hi Sandro,
After updating the MOM project's build system, I have used jenkins to
produce a set of RPMs that I would like to tag into the oVirt 3.4
release. Please see the jenkins job [1] for the relevant artifacts
for EL6[2], F19[3], and F20[4].
Dan, should I submit a patch to vdsm to make it r
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Tal Nisan wrote:
> I think it will help stabilizing the new features in a short circle, sometimes
> there are small "fine tuning" fixes that don't have bugs opened for them and
> the flow is easier if you can just backport them without opening a bug.
>
> On 01/30/2014 04:42 P
- Original Message -
> From: "R P Herrold"
> To: "Tal Nisan"
> Cc: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 7:14:34 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] bug-url requirement for stable branch backports
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Tal Nisan wrote:
>
> > I think it will help stabilizing t
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:49:42AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> After updating the MOM project's build system, I have used jenkins to
> produce a set of RPMs that I would like to tag into the oVirt 3.4
> release. Please see the jenkins job [1] for the relevant artifacts
> for EL6[2],
On 01/30/2014 07:14 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Tal Nisan wrote:
I think it will help stabilizing the new features in a short circle, sometimes
there are small "fine tuning" fixes that don't have bugs opened for them and
the flow is easier if you can just backport them without o
On 30/01/14 18:13 +, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:49:42AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
Hi Sandro,
After updating the MOM project's build system, I have used jenkins to
produce a set of RPMs that I would like to tag into the oVirt 3.4
release. Please see the jenkins job [1]
Hi
I am trying to debug GWT with google-chrome-stable-32.0.1700.77-1.x86_64 on F19
and getting the following exception
onModuleLoad() threw an exception
Exception while loading module
com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter. See Development Mode for
details.
java.lang.reflect.Invo
Did you compile GWT for use with Chrome?
I think the standard make install-dev does not, but you can add support by
setting the extra build flags like this:
DEV_EXTRA_BUILD_FLAGS_GWT_DEFAULTS="-D gwt.userAgent=gecko1_8,safari"
that will compile it with 2 iterations, one for firefox and one for c
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Wels"
> To: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Cc: "Eli Mesika"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:34:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Can not debug GWT with chrom
>
> Did you compile GWT for use with Chrome?
Solved, thanks to Alon , I was not aware
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:42:17 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] bug-url requirement for stable branch backports
>
> I'm inclined to drop the "bug-url is required" for engine stable branch
> 3.4, until we GA 3.4, as
Il 30/01/2014 19:30, Adam Litke ha scritto:
> On 30/01/14 18:13 +, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:49:42AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> Hi Sandro,
>>>
>>> After updating the MOM project's build system, I have used jenkins to
>>> produce a set of RPMs that I would like to tag
34 matches
Mail list logo
