ot; <
> engine-devel@ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:16:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> >
> > Don't go down that road. Status shouldn't be saved in the db.
> > But anyway statistics is rapidly changing. So it fits..
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
> *From: *"Liran Zelkha"
> *To: *"Gilad Chaplik"
> *Cc: *"Omer Frenkel" , "Eli Mesika" <
> emes...@redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> *Sent: *Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:27:
> From: "Liran Zelkha"
> To: "Gilad Chaplik"
> Cc: "Omer Frenkel" , "Eli Mesika" ,
> "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:27:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> True but that's no re
- Original Message -
> From: "Liran Zelkha"
> To: "Gilad Chaplik"
> Cc: "Eli Mesika" , "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:16:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
>
> Don't go down that r
i Mesika"
> > Cc: "Gilad Chaplik" , "engine-devel" <
> engine-devel@ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:36:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> >
> > I would be happy if we can lose vds_dynamic all together,
- Original Message -
> From: "Liran Zelkha"
> To: "Eli Mesika"
> Cc: "Gilad Chaplik" , "engine-devel"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:36:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
>
> I would
uot;Yair Zaslavsky"
> > Cc: "engine-devel"
> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:00:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Yair Zaslavsky"
> > > To: &qu
- Original Message -
> From: "Gilad Chaplik"
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky"
> Cc: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 4:00:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
- Original Message -
> From: "Yair Zaslavsky"
> To: "Liran Zelkha"
> Cc: "Gilad Chaplik" , "engine-devel"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:12:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
>
>
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Liran Zelkha"
> To: "Gilad Chaplik"
> Cc: "engine-devel"
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:04:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] vds_dynamic refactor
>
> Why not move it to vds_static?
+1 on Liran'
Why not move it to vds_static?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables:
> - vds_dynamic
> - vds_on_boot
> We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the
> host is booted, and I think dynamic i
Hi list,
I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables:
- vds_dynamic
- vds_on_boot
We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the host is
booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it.
In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on migrate al
12 matches
Mail list logo
