Re: [E-devel] make dist and engage--wrong path!

2005-06-02 Thread Didier Casse
Hi, raster just enlightenment me on this puzzle and he just fixed it in CVS. In engage configure.in: - MODULE_ARCH="$target_os-$target_cpu" + MODULE_ARCH="$host_os-$host_cpu" ok problem solved now. :) With kind regards, Didier. Yum/apt repository for DR17/EFL: http://sps.nus.ed

Re: [E-devel] libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread Tres Melton
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 21:04 -0400, John Ellson wrote: > Its not the xor thats failing. Its the cast of the LHS of the > assignments. I understand now. Sorry for the confusion. -- Tres --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introduc

[E-devel] Fw: e17 with entrance on Hurd

2005-06-02 Thread The Rasterman
Begin chunk 'o stuff: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:43:36 +0400 From: satyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: e17 with entrance on Hurd Hello, man. Today I find screenshot of e17 on Hurd. http://www.linux.org.ru/gallery/bigrB6jOL.png May be it

Re: [E-devel] make dist and engage--wrong path!

2005-06-02 Thread Didier Casse
On 6/2/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 10:05:06 (-0400), > John Ellson wrote: > > > Isn't this the same problem that I hit with x86_64 ?My fix was just to > > have rpm install whatever directory make generates: > > > > -%{_libdir}/enlightenment/

Re: [E-devel] libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread John Ellson
Tres Melton wrote: Has anyone actually looked into why this is failing? By the rules of Discreet Math/Boolean Algebra: something xor something = 0 something_else xor 0 = something_else so valA ^ ( valA ^ valB ) = valB If that is not working then you may have found a comp

Re: [E-devel] libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread Tres Melton
Has anyone actually looked into why this is failing? By the rules of Discreet Math/Boolean Algebra: something xor something = 0 something_else xor 0 = something_else so valA ^ ( valA ^ valB ) = valB If that is not working then you may have found a compil

Re: [E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 02 June 2005 01:01 pm, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 10:28:15 (-0400), > > John Ellson wrote: > > The problem is that the xor trick isn't working for swapping pointers. > > One possible work around is to use > > the more straightfoward SWAP code: > > > > RCS fi

Re: [E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread John Ellson
Michael Jennings wrote: On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 13:56:28 (-0400), John Ellson wrote: Sure, but then there should be a configure test for the cases that need it. Patches welcome. :) Michael RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/eterm/libast/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1

Re: [E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 13:56:28 (-0400), John Ellson wrote: > Sure, but then there should be a configure test for the cases that need it. Patches welcome. :) Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/

Re: [E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread John Ellson
Michael Jennings wrote: Why not just define STRICT_ISO_C99? I created it specifically for that purpose. Sure, but then there should be a configure test for the cases that need it. john --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Intr

[E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 10:28:15 (-0400), John Ellson wrote: > The problem is that the xor trick isn't working for swapping pointers. > One possible work around is to use > the more straightfoward SWAP code: > > RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/eterm/libast/include/libast.h,v > retrievin

[E-devel] libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-02 Thread John Ellson
Michael Jennings wrote: John wins again. Michael, Thanks for your support, again. :-) Just so that no one thinks we're ganging up on them, here is one for you ;-) libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64. /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include/libast -I

Re: [E-devel] make dist and engage--wrong path!

2005-06-02 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 10:05:06 (-0400), John Ellson wrote: > Isn't this the same problem that I hit with x86_64 ?My fix was just to > have rpm install whatever directory make generates: > > -%{_libdir}/enlightenment/modules_extra/engage/linux-gnu-i686/* > +%{_libdir}/enlightenment/mo

Re: [E-devel] make dist and engage--wrong path!

2005-06-02 Thread John Ellson
Didier Casse wrote: Hi there, Previously to install packages I used: ./autogen.sh make make install But now Fedora requires to do: ./autogen.sh make dist then take the << resulting tarball >> then do a: ./configure make make install For all the packages this seem to be fine e

[E-devel] make dist and engage--wrong path!

2005-06-02 Thread Didier Casse
Hi there, Previously to install packages I used: ./autogen.sh make make install But now Fedora requires to do: ./autogen.sh make dist then take the << resulting tarball >> then do a: ./configure make make install For all the packages this seem to be fine except for engage and pro

Re: [E-devel] Google's Summer of Code

2005-06-02 Thread David Sharp
On 6/2/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 01:09:02 -0700 David Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > We originally were not going to take new mentors, but we > > decided to> open it up for one more day.> > Wait till tomorrow and pick > > another men

Re: [E-devel] Google's Summer of Code

2005-06-02 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 01:09:02 -0700 David Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > We originally were not going to take new mentors, but we > decided to> open it up for one more day.> > Wait till tomorrow and pick > another mentor if they can't do it in time.> > Chris> so, maybe beg as Didier

Re: [E-devel] Google's Summer of Code

2005-06-02 Thread David Sharp
On 6/2/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:19:46 -0400 Stefan Gueorguiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and just to make everyone unhappy... we're too late. :( > Are you sure? i saw this email on the summer-discuss list: http://groups-beta.google.com/gr

Re: [E-devel] Google's Summer of Code

2005-06-02 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:32:48 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 6/2/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:19:46 -0400 Stefan Gueorguiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > and just to make everyone unhappy... we're too late

Re: [E-devel] Google's Summer of Code

2005-06-02 Thread Didier Casse
On 6/2/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:19:46 -0400 Stefan Gueorguiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and just to make everyone unhappy... we're too late. :( How about begging? ;-) I'm pretty sure they can make an exception. And it also depends who's a

Re: [E-devel] Google's Summer of Code

2005-06-02 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:19:46 -0400 Stefan Gueorguiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and just to make everyone unhappy... we're too late. :( -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多