I'm going to recommend Mantis. I find Bugzilla a pain in the ass to use
as everything is just plastered everywhere. At least that is how it was
the last time I used it about a year ago. I have played around with
Flyspray a bit as well and it seemed pretty nice. Also Mantis seemed a
bit easi
With the `new' managed smart objects, layer changes are not causing the
object to be marked as dirty. This fixes that problem.
---
src/lib/canvas/evas_layer.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libs/evas/src/lib/canvas/evas_layer.c
b/libs/evas/src/lib/canvas
>
> yes, you're nuts ;) (sorry you set yourself up for that)
> Second point I also think we should use bugzilla it may be a bit
> overkill but at least it does wtf we want it to do so I vote we
> setup bugzilla and I'm willing to do so, but we know you spent a
> lot of time setting this one
dan sinclair wrote:
> We've been trying the new Bug genie bug tracker for a little while now
> and I must say, I'm pretty disappointed in it's abilities. It took a lot
> of effort to get setup, and we haven't been able to figure out how to do
> simple things like change a bugs product or attach
Am Wed, 4 Jul 2007 22:41:53 +0300 schrieb Luchezar Petkov:
> > I don't like the current bug tracker. But maybe it's because I'm
> > used with
> >
> > bugzilla, which I like
> >
> > so I vote for bugzilla :)
> >
> > Vincent
>
>
>
bugzilla++
Andreas
Am Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:33:25 +0200 (CEST) schrieb Vincent Torri:
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
>
> > +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(ECORE, [ecore ecore-desktop ecore-ipc])
> > +AC_SUBST(ECORE_CFLAGS)
> > +AC_SUBST(ECORE_LIBS)
>
> there is no need to AC_SUBST. PKG_CHECK_MODULES does tha
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(ECORE, [ecore ecore-desktop ecore-ipc])
> +AC_SUBST(ECORE_CFLAGS)
> +AC_SUBST(ECORE_LIBS)
there is no need to AC_SUBST. PKG_CHECK_MODULES does that for you
Vincent
---
Am Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:21:33 -0400 schrieb Didier Casse:
> Hi there,
> evfs complains that "ecore-config" is not in. I have the
> latest ecore packages in. It might be due to the recent change in
> structure of the packages and the fact that evfs didn't have time to
> update. Log attac
> I don't like the current bug tracker. But maybe it's because I'm used with
>
> bugzilla, which I like
>
> so I vote for bugzilla :)
>
> Vincent
Same here.
--
Luchezar P. Petkov
http://luchko.wordpress.com
-
This SF.net e
cd /home/didier/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ cd /home/didier/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf evfs-0.0.1
+ /bin/gzip -dc /home/didier/rpmbuild/SOURCES/evfs-0.0.1-20070704.tar.gz
+ tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd evfs-0.0.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[&
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, dan sinclair wrote:
> We've been trying the new Bug genie bug tracker for a little while now
> and I must say, I'm pretty disappointed in it's abilities. It took a lot
> of effort to get setup, and we haven't been able to figure out how to do
> simple things like change a bug
I've run into similar issues with this one, but thought it might have
been an issue in the configuration. If that's not the case, then I
think looking at alternatives would be a good idea.
Not being able to attach files to a posted bug is a huge issue. It
makes exchanging patches in the bug tracke
We've been trying the new Bug genie bug tracker for a little while now
and I must say, I'm pretty disappointed in it's abilities. It took a lot
of effort to get setup, and we haven't been able to figure out how to do
simple things like change a bugs product or attach patches after the bug
has b
On 7/4/07, Caio Marcelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/3/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > AFAIK, autotools doesn't support these things, maybe CMake but I'm not
> > > sure, do you know any build infrastructure that supports this? I'd
> > > really like to have this setup so w
On 7/3/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK, autotools doesn't support these things, maybe CMake but I'm not
> > sure, do you know any build infrastructure that supports this? I'd
> > really like to have this setup so we could use GCC better, for systems
> > like Nokia N800 and
15 matches
Mail list logo
