Michael wrote:
> > There is no good reason to have three different toolkits in
> > the same project,
>
> Of course, this is what a lot of other people said about Etk back
> before it got thrown in CVS. So now you sound hypocritical.
It does sound a bit hypocritical. I would dis
On Wednesday, 14 November 2007, at 21:45:55 (+0100),
Simon TRENY wrote:
> There is no good reason to have three different toolkits in the same
> project,
Of course, this is what a lot of other people said about Etk back
before it got thrown in CVS. So now you sound hypocritical.
Michael
--
Mi
On Sunday, 11 November 2007, at 12:52:57 (-0300),
Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Yes, CVS is working and that's exactly what keeps people not seeing
> how better we would be with git. Being able to commit locally,
> create branches to work on separate features and be able to merge
> afterwards and so on
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 5:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the desktop (and/or fm) component can do whatever it now
does with "icons", and whatever else it does with "gadgets", then
why can't it do anything with "whizblings"? Or wit
Would it be possible to get the configuration panel to refresh the
available modules once a new configuration module is loaded?
eg.
1. Load 'Configuration - Transitions'
2. Should refresh the available configuration modules
3. Should be able to select Apperance > Transitions
~What happens is that
On Nov 21, 2007 5:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If the desktop (and/or fm) component can do whatever it now
> > > does with "icons", and whatever else it does with "gadgets", then
> > > why can't it do anything with "whizblings"? Or with "wambots", or
> > > with ..
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> you can. its a few trivial lines of module code to go put any evas object on
> the desktop. anywhere. a few more to allow you to just move it around anywhere
> - and a few more to resize. if you REALLY want that. a shelf is NOT THE
> SOLUTION TO THIS. ty
> > If the desktop (and/or fm) component can do whatever it now
> > does with "icons", and whatever else it does with "gadgets", then
> > why can't it do anything with "whizblings"? Or with "wambots", or
> > with . ?
>
>
> you can. its a few trivial lines of module code to go put any eva