[E-devel] e17 - additional border hooks

2009-09-02 Thread hannes.janet...@gmail.com
Hello, attached is a patch that adds border hooks for new-border, desk-set and move/resize states. With these hooks it is possible to need no further modifications in e_border for the ecomorph module. I've also changed e_moveresize so that it uses the border hooks instead of being called from

Re: [E-devel] e17 - additional border hooks

2009-09-02 Thread hannes.janet...@gmail.com
whoops, the ECOMORPH_ATOM_MANAGED belongs of course not to the proposed patch. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:23 AM, hannes.janet...@gmail.comhannes.janet...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello, attached is a patch that adds border hooks for new-border, desk-set and move/resize states. With these hooks it

Re: [E-devel] Was: Re: NOTICE: svn feature freeze this weekend (Sep 4-6)

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
Hello, Hope this and code examples are enough. Any doubts please post on the ML. It sounds perfectly clear to me especially with the example code. I will start to look at it and do necessary modifications later today. best Mathieu

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: watchwolf IN trunk/PROTO/exalt/src: bin lib lib_dbus

2009-09-02 Thread Atton Jonathan
This is not internal. I have one low level library which define a list of macro for doing assertion. (EXALT_ASSERT_*). These macros use EXALT_LOG_*. The daemon and the dbus library use these assertions, that's why EXALT_LOG is not internal. 2009/9/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri

[E-devel] Exalt move to LGPL

2009-09-02 Thread Atton Jonathan
hey, I plan to move exalt and the module from GPL to LGPL. I have written 99% of the code. Some peoples as Cedric, barbieri, rbelem, raoul, caro and pfritz have made some API fixed and quaker works on the package. If nobody have a problem with this change, I will do it this week. -- Regards.

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/ecore: po src/lib/ecore_evas src/lib/ecore_x/xlib

2009-09-02 Thread Vincent Torri
Modified: trunk/ecore/po/Makefile.in.in === --- trunk/ecore/po/Makefile.in.in 2009-09-02 12:48:00 UTC (rev 42181) +++ trunk/ecore/po/Makefile.in.in 2009-09-02 12:48:56 UTC (rev 42182) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # Makefile for PO

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: watchwolf IN trunk/PROTO/exalt/src: bin lib lib_dbus

2009-09-02 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Atton Jonathanjonathan.at...@gmail.com wrote: This is not internal. I have one low level library which define a list of macro for doing assertion. (EXALT_ASSERT_*). These macros use EXALT_LOG_*. The daemon and the dbus library use these assertions, that's why

Re: [E-devel] Exalt move to LGPL

2009-09-02 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Atton Jonathanjonathan.at...@gmail.com wrote: hey, I plan to move exalt and the module from GPL to LGPL. I have written 99% of the code. Some peoples as Cedric, barbieri, rbelem, raoul, caro and pfritz have made some API fixed and quaker works on the package.

[E-devel] Status of eve?

2009-09-02 Thread Laszlo KREKACS
Hi! On shr (a distribution for the Freerunner phone) eve was built once, and worked rather fine (finger scrolling!). Now it does not build anymore, thus it is not included in the distribution. I am asking who is working on eve webbrowser, and what is his plan? I would like also know if the

Re: [E-devel] Status of eve?

2009-09-02 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Laszlo KREKACSlaszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! On shr (a distribution for the Freerunner phone) eve was built once, and worked rather fine (finger scrolling!). Now it does not build anymore, thus it is not included in the distribution. weird, it

Re: [E-devel] Status of eve?

2009-09-02 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:22:17 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Laszlo KREKACSlaszlo.krekacs.l...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! On shr (a distribution for the Freerunner phone) eve was built once, and worked rather fine (finger

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: watchwolf IN trunk/PROTO/exalt/src: bin lib lib_dbus

2009-09-02 Thread Atton Jonathan
In fact EXALT_LOG_DOMAIN is private. The others projects have to define it if they want use the macros EXALT_ASSERT_*, else gcc will returns an error (undefined EXALT_LOG_DOMAIN). 2009/9/2 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Atton

Re: [E-devel] Was: Re: NOTICE: svn feature freeze this weekend (Sep 4-6)

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
Hello, As my previous message said I think I understand the changes to do but to be sure i would like to try with one example of my own. For this I take the function eina_array_init() for the eina_array.c file. the original code is this one (minus uninteresting details for the discussion)

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] Was: Re: NOTICE: svn feature freeze this weekend (Sep 4-6)

2009-09-02 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Mathieu Taillefumiermathieu.taillefum...@free.fr wrote: Hello, As my previous message said I think I understand the changes to do but to be sure i would like to try with one example of my own. For this I take the function eina_array_init() for the eina_array.c

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/ecore: po src/lib/ecore_evas src/lib/ecore_x/xlib

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Wehrfritz
Vincent Torri wrote: Modified: trunk/ecore/po/Makefile.in.in === --- trunk/ecore/po/Makefile.in.in2009-09-02 12:48:00 UTC (rev 42181) +++ trunk/ecore/po/Makefile.in.in2009-09-02 12:48:56 UTC (rev 42182) @@ -1,5 +1,5

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] Was: Re: NOTICE: svn feature freeze this weekend (Sep 4-6)

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
Now what is the difference between EINA_LOG_ERR and EINA_LOG_DOM_ERR in this case. Would it be wise to create an individual logging domain for each module or can we stick to the central logging domain defined in eina_log_init() function. Now in the following example, i can not delete the

[E-devel] RFC: turning pkg-config's Requires: fiels into Requires.private

2009-09-02 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Hello. According to Use of the 'Requires.private' field in pkg-config files thread (http://tinyurl.com/e-devel-req-private) it would be nice to have Requires.private fields in E .pc files instead of Requires, if pkg-config supports them. Attached is the RFC patch (eet only) which adds check for