At 8:20pm, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 05/31/2010 08:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:53:50 -0400 Christopher
>> Michael
>> said:
>>
>>> On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher
On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:04:05 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> Going to start working on adding the Add/Del buttons to the ACPI
> Bindings dialog tomorrow and was wondering if anyone had thoughts on how
> the Add should work ?
>
> Should we display a dialog with the list of available ACPI even
On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:41:44 +0200 Antonio Palladini said:
smells to me like the packages missed the .so files for the pages...
> Hi Devs,
>
> i have purged my ~/.e directory to get a fresh config, but the wizard can
> not start and give me the following error :
>
> /opt/lib/enlightenment/mo
On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:21:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 05/31/2010 08:18 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:04:05 -0400 Christopher
> > Michael said:
> >
> >> Going to start working on adding the Add/Del buttons to the ACPI
> >> Bindings dialog tomorr
On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:53:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher
> > Michael said:
> >
> >> On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
> >>> If we want users to have to hack any new
On 05/31/2010 08:18 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:04:05 -0400 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
>> Going to start working on adding the Add/Del buttons to the ACPI
>> Bindings dialog tomorrow and was wondering if anyone had thoughts on how
>> the Add should work ?
On 05/31/2010 08:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:53:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
>> On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher
>>> Michael said:
>>>
On 05/31/10 12:55, Chr
Going to start working on adding the Add/Del buttons to the ACPI
Bindings dialog tomorrow and was wondering if anyone had thoughts on how
the Add should work ?
Should we display a dialog with the list of available ACPI events ? Or
do we want to use an approach like Key bindings dialog where an
On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
>> On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
>>> all means, make a snapshot :P
>>>
>>> Si
On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
> > If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
> > all means, make a snapshot :P
> >
> > Since the wizard module does not start anymore on new configs (I'm not
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Andreas Volz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've a question about:
>
> EAPI void
> evas_object_smart_callback_add(Evas_Object *obj, const char *event,
> void (*func) (void *data, Evas_Object *obj, void *event_info), const
> void *data)
>
> Why is event_info a void* data type
Hello,
I've a question about:
EAPI void
evas_object_smart_callback_add(Evas_Object *obj, const char *event,
void (*func) (void *data, Evas_Object *obj, void *event_info), const
void *data)
Why is event_info a void* data type and not some type of struct? To
which struct should I cast it to do so
On 05/31/10 13:42, Massimo Maiurana wrote:
> Christopher Michael, il 31/05/2010 19:31, scrisse:
>
>>> this is from an svn updated at yesterday morning, I'll try to update and
>>> rebuild it again to see if something changes.
>>>
>> Well, that is not going to solve the problem. The issue here is tha
Christopher Michael, il 31/05/2010 19:31, scrisse:
>> this is from an svn updated at yesterday morning, I'll try to update and
>> rebuild it again to see if something changes.
>>
> Well, that is not going to solve the problem. The issue here is that
> when you updated yesterday morning, the defaul
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> THESE ARE NOT SKELETONS ANYMORE!
please don't use upper case commit descriptions
Vincent
>
> Author: discomfitor
> Date: 2010-05-31 10:29:40 -0700 (Mon, 31 May 2010)
> New Revision: 49357
>
> Modified:
> trunk/E-MODULES-EX
On 05/31/10 13:24, Massimo Maiurana wrote:
> Christopher Michael, il 31/05/2010 18:49, scrisse:
>
>> How do you possibly have no action there ?? That makes no sense at all.
>> The defaults are setup so that lid closed will call suspend (as will
>> sleep button)...power button calls halt.
>
> so the
Christopher Michael, il 31/05/2010 18:56, scrisse:
> On 05/31/10 12:47, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>> if e's grey box "im hibernating" doesn't come up - its acpid doing the
>> executing of hibernate - not e. as such that config dialog needs to be
>> able to
>> add and delete binding
Christopher Michael, il 31/05/2010 18:49, scrisse:
> How do you possibly have no action there ?? That makes no sense at all.
> The defaults are setup so that lid closed will call suspend (as will
> sleep button)...power button calls halt.
so there is an "halt" action configured but the acpi-bindi
On 05/31/10 13:02, Massimo Maiurana wrote:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 31/05/2010 18:47, scrisse:
>
>> if e's grey box "im hibernating" doesn't come up - its acpid doing the
>> executing of hibernate - not e.
>
> i'm not saying that E hibernates the system, really the opposite.
> E halts
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 31/05/2010 18:47, scrisse:
> if e's grey box "im hibernating" doesn't come up - its acpid doing the
> executing of hibernate - not e.
i'm not saying that E hibernates the system, really the opposite.
E halts the system, and acpid hibernates it, but what is odd
On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
> If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
> all means, make a snapshot :P
>
> Since the wizard module does not start anymore on new configs (I'm not
> even sure that it builds/installs either), then users who are new to
>
On 05/31/10 12:47, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:20:32 +0200 Massimo Maiurana said:
>
> if e's grey box "im hibernating" doesn't come up - its acpid doing the
> executing of hibernate - not e. as such that config dialog needs to be able to
> add and delete bindin
If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
all means, make a snapshot :P
Since the wizard module does not start anymore on new configs (I'm not
even sure that it builds/installs either), then users who are new to
using E (read: have no existing e.cfg at all) will get
On 05/31/10 12:20, Massimo Maiurana wrote:
> in the acpi-bindings configuration I have 5 available bindings and 2 possible
> actions, bounded together as it follows (default):
>
> ac adapter unplugged -> dim screen
> ac adapter plugged -> undim screen
> lid closed -> no action
> powe
On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:20:32 +0200 Massimo Maiurana said:
if e's grey box "im hibernating" doesn't come up - its acpid doing the
executing of hibernate - not e. as such that config dialog needs to be able to
add and delete bindings - not just modify existing ones. then its complete,
> in the acp
in the acpi-bindings configuration I have 5 available bindings and 2 possible
actions, bounded together as it follows (default):
ac adapter unplugged -> dim screen
ac adapter plugged -> undim screen
lid closed -> no action
power button -> no action
sleep button -> no ac
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>>
On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>>
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote:
> Hi,
>>
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote:
>
>> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago.
You can
ok... let's talk snapshot. i think time is about right to do one now. a lot of
stuff has gone in since the last ones. now.. i'm in "watch svn settle and just
do some peripheral things that dont affect core stuff" mode.
what i want to know is about core stability issues you have seen and other
issu
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago.
>>> You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590.
>>
>> as quaker
On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago.
>> You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590.
>
> as quaker still don't want to (can't ?) work on a new entrance, I'm more
> in
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote:
Hi,
Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago.
You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590.
as quaker still don't want to (can't ?) work on a new entrance, I'm more
inclined to add it again to svn. He deleted it by saying a new o
Hi,
Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago.
You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590.
Regards,
2010/5/31 rui kou
> HI，where can I get the code of entrance??
>
> --
>
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
