uh... just before? not after?
Does not Ecore depend on Eina ?
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Torrivincent.to...@gmail.com
To: Enlightenment developer listenlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Cc:
Sent: 2012-05-29 (화)
Ah i was crazy.
it's ok.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: ChunEon Parkher...@naver.com
To: Enlightenment developer listenlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Cc:
Sent: 2012-05-29 (화) 15:04:06
Subject: Re: [E-devel] [Patch][Ecore]
于 2012/5/29 15:31, E-Trac 写道:
#1022: Crashed when --enable-wayland-clients
---+-
Reporter: zhiwen.wu@…| Owner: raster
Type: Bug| Status: new
Priority: Blocker| Milestone:
Component: enlightenment
Dear Gustavo
I considered your opinion and devised a method for more panel.
The screen of mobile device is small. So the option that the main tab items
are shown and the others are hidden is needed sometime in it.
The standard is necessary in order to divide the main items and the others.
If the
On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:15:26 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com
said:
it's not a break, but it does add warnings to apps. they may decide to handle
those warnings as they see fit. ignore them or do something about them. if they
use -Werror.. frankly.. that's their business. a warning
Looks good to me!
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Bluezery wrote:
Dear EFL developers,
This patch checks the internal value of ecore_shutdown() as Gustavo
Sverzut Barbieri suggested in
http://www.mail-archive.com/enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg41829.html
.
If ecore_shtudown()
Don't we have priority already? AFAIR we introduced it because of that
reason! :)
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Jaehwan Kim wrote:
Dear Gustavo
I considered your opinion and devised a method for more panel.
The screen of mobile device is small. So the option that the main tab items
are shown
On 05/29/12 06:34, Vincent Torri wrote:
hey,
we are backporting fixes to previous releases, but we don't release
them. If we don't, then backporting is useless. So when will we
release them ?
Vincent
I'm wondering too. For now, I have switched SlackE17 to follow 1.2
branch and I guess
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey
here is a patch that fix a bug in
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
fix case where user can specify item block size 1; this also reveals an api
error since the param here should obviously be a uint.
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2012-05-29 02:04:42 -0700
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 14:15:26 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com
said:
it's not a break, but it does add warnings to apps. they may decide to handle
those warnings as they see fit. ignore them or do
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:07:24PM +0900, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
but it breaks applications when they use -Werror option.
You can use -Wno-deprecated to selectively disable the warning or
-Wno-error=deprecated to keep the warning, but don't assert on it.
Make sure to put that after -Werror
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:03 AM,
Gentleman,
Currently the online documentation is generated nightly from the latest code,
while this is fine, it can also be a bit confusing for people using the
releases since it might contain functions that they can't use. I propose we
start providing 3 version of the documentation online,
3 sets seems overkill since we never do point releases of old (dead) branches.
People can always build or install their own docs.
Jonas M. Gastal jgas...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Gentleman,
Currently the online documentation is generated nightly from the latest code,
while this is fine, it can
2012/5/29 Mike Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com:
3 sets seems overkill since we never do point releases of old (dead)
branches. People can always build or install their own docs.
Jonas M. Gastal jgas...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Gentleman,
Currently the online documentation is
Currently the python bindings have get/set functions as in the C api,
in addition to this it has object properties which have their
functionality implemented by simply calling those functions, such as
in the below example:
def remember_position_set(self, remember):
* Kai Huuhko kai.huu...@gmail.com [2012-05-29 23:33:19 +0300]:
Currently the python bindings have get/set functions as in the C api,
in addition to this it has object properties which have their
functionality implemented by simply calling those functions, such as
in the below example:
def
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
gl...@profusion.mobi wrote:
* Kai Huuhko kai.huu...@gmail.com [2012-05-29 23:33:19 +0300]:
Currently the python bindings have get/set functions as in the C api,
in addition to this it has object properties which have their
functionality
2012/5/29 Kai Huuhko kai.huu...@gmail.com:
Currently the python bindings have get/set functions as in the C api,
in addition to this it has object properties which have their
functionality implemented by simply calling those functions, such as
in the below example:
def
2012/5/29 Davide Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it:
2012/5/29 Kai Huuhko kai.huu...@gmail.com:
Currently the python bindings have get/set functions as in the C api,
in addition to this it has object properties which have their
functionality implemented by simply calling those functions, such as
On 05/29/12 14:36, Jonas M. Gastal wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2012 11:43:19 Jérôme Pinot wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch to fix elementary doxygen doc:
- #link on the beginning of a new line does give ugly output:
http://ngc891.blogdns.net/pub/projects/debug/doxygen-formating-eww.png
- some
Thanks for your response!
Yeap.. I have attached newly made patch based on the access module.
to convey mouse in event to the widget when you move your finger(or mouse).
Thanks,
Shinwoo Kim.
*PS:
To show gratitude.. I convey the awesome link from Hyundai Motor
Group, in Yeosu expo. Look
Yes, the items of toolbar already have a priority. If the toolbar cannot
shrink anymore by downscaling the window size,
the more item is shown and the items which has low priority are just shown
by clicking the more item.
We need to hide items even if the toolbar size is not minimum.
So I
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Jaehwan Kim jaehwan.kim@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, the items of toolbar already have a priority. If the toolbar cannot
shrink anymore by downscaling the window size,
the more item is shown and the items which has low priority are just shown
by clicking the more
Dear All,
Thank you for your comments.
I would like to send you the modified patch.
Followings are my modification:
- Add my part to ChangeLog, AUTHORS files as Raster's comment.
- Add const to the parameter of elm_entry_text_style_user_peek and example for
pop and peek to test_entry_style_user
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
fix case where user can specify item block size 1; this also reveals an
api error since the param here should
This won't work when you prepend genlist item continuously.
To test that I used timer with interval 0.5 and 1 sec.
Sometimes selected item stayed at the same position but sometimes
selected item scrolled out of the viewport.
Can you check that?
Thanks in advance.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue,
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:53:26 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:10:55 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com
said:
I guess he means this:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 20:29:57 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org
said:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com writes:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:35:23 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa
rak...@freebsd.org said:
Should this be backported, as currently no stable release has
31 matches
Mail list logo
