Re: [E-devel] git.e.org is not synced anymore

git.enlightenment.org is still not working... Is there any chance any body fixes this? Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Tomas Cech wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:50:34AM +0100, Jérémy Zur

Re: [E-devel] Issue with elm.Entry.entry_get and password = True

I never got a response in my inbox - care to forward it to me? On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Already replied to that... > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jeff Hoogland >wrote: > > > Ping. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Hoogland > >wrote: > > > >

Re: [E-devel] Error building efl/

On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:28:05 -0200 "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" said: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) > wrote: > > Taking a look on elementary and e, it seems that the version definition is > > under > > > > m4_ifdef([AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION], [ > > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([

Re: [E-devel] Error building efl/

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > Taking a look on elementary and e, it seems that the version definition is > under > > m4_ifdef([AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION], [ > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.17]) > ]) > > Patching configure.ac solves the issue. > Actually no, it does n

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] desklock is not working on idle timer

Well, you're right, that code doesn't seem to be right. I will remove that fullscreen check "feature" as we have now the presentation mode and this is more something historical. Kind regards, Brian On 01/13/2013 12:03 AM, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote: > Hi guys, > I currently have set "Lock when id

Re: [E-devel] Error building efl/

Taking a look on elementary and e, it seems that the version definition is under m4_ifdef([AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION], [ AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.17]) ]) Patching configure.ac solves the issue. On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > Making all in po > *** error: gettext

[E-devel] Error building efl/

Making all in po *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18 make[2]: *** [check-macro-version] Error 1 How do I fix the build without patching configure.ac like this? -AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0

[E-devel] [PATCH] desklock is not working on idle timer

Hi guys, I currently have set "Lock when idle timer exceeded" and "Lock even on fullscreen windows" settings enabled for a desklock. It doesn't work, so i debugged it a little and with the above options set i've got: e_config->screen_actions_fullscreen_windows_ignore = 1 e_util_fullscreen_any() =

Re: [E-devel] ecore.Exe() example

2013/1/11 Jeff Hoogland > Can anyone provide me with a simple example that uses ecore.Exe to fire a > system command using the python bindings? I'm reading over help(ecore.Exe) > and it isn't very straight forward how I just make it run a command of my > choosing. > Hi, you can find a working us

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

Coolz :) This may help you write patches. http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/PatchReview Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jaeun Choi wrote: > thanks! > > 1. no whitespace change this time > 2. include a backport to stable 1.7 branch > > -- > Jaeun Choi > > > > > > ---

Re: [E-devel] Heads Up: EFL single tree is ready for tests!

On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Cool news, what about elementary? No plans as I'm always saying regarding more complex dependencies. Elm should be solo IMO. Also, it's just 2 packages now, very simple :-) If we agree on the mandatory options of EFL, then elm can be simplifi

Re: [E-devel] "check" requirement for efl build

On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: > I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not > just a make thing? Because it is a library and must be detected otherwise the tests won't compile. > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Doug Newgard > > > wrote: >

Re: [E-devel] Elementary Gesture Layer Input Variants? Trackpad vs. Touchscreen?

We already talked about it in IRC. :) Patches are welcomed if you want the efl to recognise trackpad multitouch that are passed raw from the driver. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:44:19 + "Rottsches, Dominik" > said: > > it's so much shorte

Re: [E-devel] Issue with elm.Entry.entry_get and password = True

Already replied to that... On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > Ping. > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Hoogland >wrote: > > > I ran into an issue this afternoon that gave me all sorts of headaches > > until I sorted through some debug output. > > > > It seems that

Re: [E-devel] "check" requirement for efl build

I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not just a make thing? On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Doug Newgard wrote: > It already is conditional. It only requires check if you build the tests, > which > the dev profile does by default. If you don't want the tests, ju

Re: [E-devel] Heads Up: EFL single tree is ready for tests!

Cool news, what about elementary? On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > Hi all, > > Finally all the libs are in trunk/efl, making compilation hopefully > faster and simpler. But as every major change, we need testers and > cleanup. > > It w

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/data/themes/edc

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:59:24 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > unset color class for comp popups, onefangs rejoice again > > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2013-01-11 13:59:24 -0800 (Fri, 11 Jan 2013) > New Revision: 82673 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/c

Re: [E-devel] Eet testsuite failures

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Hi Lutin, > > both seem correct to me. Let's wait for others to chime in, but they should > be okay. I'd like to upload those fixes to Debian soon, so now would be a good time for anyone who'd like to object :) -- Albin -

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

thanks! 1. no whitespace change this time 2. include a backport to stable 1.7 branch -- Jaeun Choi -Original Message- From: "Carsten Haitzler" To: "Enlightenment developer list"; Cc: "Jaeun Choi"

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:30:34 +0900 (KST) Jaeun Choi said: > I removed some unnecessary lines from elm_index.c > > 1. in _index_box_auto_fill > _index_box_clear(line 178) does nothing: > if _index_box_clear is called, it means sd->level_active[level] is false > (line 116). if sd->level_act

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

sorry ignore this Sent from my iPhone On 2013. 1. 12., at 오후 5:21, Jaeun Choi wrote: > I removed some unnecessary lines from elm_index.c > > 1. in _index_box_auto_fill > _index_box_clear(line 178) does nothing: > if _index_box_clear is called, it means sd->level_active[level] is false

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

sorry ignore this naver sucks Sent from my iPhone On 2013. 1. 12., at 오후 5:34, Jaeun Choi wrote: > I removed some unnecessary lines from elm_index.c > > > > > > 1. in _index_box_auto_fill > > > _index_box_clear(line 178) does nothing: > > > if _index_box_clear is called, it means s

[E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

I removed some unnecessary lines from elm_index.c 1. in _index_box_auto_fill _index_box_clear(line 178) does nothing: if _index_box_clear is called, it means sd->level_active[level] is false (line 116). if sd->level_active[level] is false, _index_box_clear returns immediately

[E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

I removed some unnecessary lines from elm_index.c 1. in _index_box_auto_fill _index_box_clear(line 178) does nothing: if _index_box_clear is called, it means sd->level_active[level] is false (line 116). if sd->level_active[level] is false, _index_box_clear returns immediately (line 60).

Re: [E-devel] efl merge and win32

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:59:48 +1000 David Seikel said: > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:51:04 +0900 Cedric BAIL > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:46:42 +0900 Cedric BAIL

[E-devel] [PATCH] elm_index: removed unnecessary lines

I removed some unnecessary lines from elm_index.c 1. in _index_box_auto_fill _index_box_clear(line 178) does nothing: if _index_box_clear is called, it means sd->level_active[level] is false (line 116). if sd->level_active[level] is false, _index_box_clear returns immediately (line 60).