On 29/09/15 09:12, Andrew Williams wrote:
> \o/ cheers.
>
> Working much better for me right now.
That was a funny one. Essentially, it would cause some callbacks to be
called twice, and sometimes the wrong callback to be called.
Glad things work again, and sorry for the disruption.
--
Tom.
>
\o/ cheers.
Working much better for me right now.
Andy
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 at 08:47, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> BTW, was too tired last night and forgot to mention it on the ML. As said
> on IRC: fixed!
> On 28 Sep 2015 23:08, "Tom Hacohen" wrote:
>
> > Also, please don't "revert way more". I don't
Way too tired in the morning, I meant as *ami* said on phab. :)
On 29/09/15 08:50, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> He he, yeah, client is still annoying. ;)
> Thanks for taking care of everything. If it's what I think you are talking
> about, the casting is a very bad idea (as you said yourself on phab). If
He he, yeah, client is still annoying. ;)
Thanks for taking care of everything. If it's what I think you are talking
about, the casting is a very bad idea (as you said yourself on phab). If
the function expects a non cost value, it implies you should strdup it.
--
Tom
On 29 Sep 2015 07:05, "SHILPA
BTW, was too tired last night and forgot to mention it on the ML. As said
on IRC: fixed!
On 28 Sep 2015 23:08, "Tom Hacohen" wrote:
> Also, please don't "revert way more". I don't know why it would be broken,
> again, I don't see it. That being said, I don't use Enlightenment, maybe it
> just sho
