Re: [E-devel] embryo define checking

2016-02-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:52:52 + Mike Blumenkrantz said: > I am trying to avoid using the efl version defines because they don't > indicate if it's the prerelease from git, meaning that the features aren't > usable until the release occurs; not very helpful if I want a feature to be > active no

Re: [E-devel] embryo define checking

2016-02-26 Thread Andrew Williams
Hypothetical of course but what about bug fix workarounds? I.e behave like x instead of y if >1.7 < 1.7.3 Or requiring 1.10.1 as something didn't work right on the first release of the feature? Andy On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 at 14:31, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:52:52 + Mike B

Re: [E-devel] embryo define checking

2016-02-26 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:31 AM Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:52:52 + Mike Blumenkrantz > said: > > > I am trying to avoid using the efl version defines because they don't > > indicate if it's the prerelease from git, meaning that the features > aren't > > usable until the

Re: [E-devel] embryo define checking

2016-02-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:04:32 + Mike Blumenkrantz said: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:31 AM Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:52:52 + Mike Blumenkrantz > > said: > > > > > I am trying to avoid using the efl version defines because they don't > > > indicate if it's the

Re: [E-devel] embryo define checking

2016-02-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:57:06 + Andrew Williams said: > Hypothetical of course but what about bug fix workarounds? > I.e behave like x instead of y if >1.7 < 1.7.3 > Or requiring 1.10.1 as something didn't work right on the first release of > the feature? hypothetical ... and given point rele

[E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-26 Thread The Rasterman
we were discussing this and i don't remember an adequate solution. so we're needing to allow multiple event loops (main loop). ok = first loop created == main loop. fine. store that in a global. but after this... what loop does an object belong to? ok - timers: create timer. set parent to the l

Re: [E-devel] Evas box layout doesn't guarantee items' min size.

2016-02-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:08:19 +0900 Conrad Um said: > I am trying to bring edje box and table to elm.box and elm.table to provide > more features. > > Unlike table, each box can have its own layout function, so there are > several issues to adopt edje box at once. So, if there are not significant

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 01/01: edje_cc: abort compile when unnamed part exists

2016-02-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:23:57 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) said: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:53:48 +0900 (KST) Hermet Park > said: > > > I think this changes edc grammar. > > only one part may not need a part name. > > and App edc will be broken after this patch. > > > > Do you really li