On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:24:25 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2 March 2016 at 10:36, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > raster pushed a commit to branch master.
> >
> >
> > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=7920e66f29e7b2bed8f58d1768c008b199be322a
> >
> > commit 792
Hi,
On 2 March 2016 at 10:36, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> raster pushed a commit to branch master.
>
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=7920e66f29e7b2bed8f58d1768c008b199be322a
>
> commit 7920e66f29e7b2bed8f58d1768c008b199be322a
> Author: Carsten Haitzler (Rasterman)
> Date
Hello everyone,
Already miss you all!
(besides Jack and hedsy :) )
After meetings in HQ, I updated UI format description and you can take a
look on it.
I've not fully switched to interfaces yet, so some points could be not
relevant. Please correct.
You can find it here:
https://phab.enlightenme
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:05:06 + Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> The Eo syntax is going to be changing once more, and this time, I
> really think/hope it'll be the last time. We plan on stabilizing Eo
> and all of the functions on top of it in the next few months, so that
> doesn't leave us much more time
On 01/03/16 09:23, Andrew Williams wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Overall it looks great :)
> I'm curious, however, about why we need the worse eo_add syntax - it seems
> like a step backwards and passing a pointer and its address in the same
> line seems a little messy :(
I know, I explicitly said it's a b
Hi Tom,
Overall it looks great :)
I'm curious, however, about why we need the worse eo_add syntax - it seems
like a step backwards and passing a pointer and its address in the same
line seems a little messy :(
Other thought - I expect that looking for the result of eo_super and
referencing later
Hey,
The Eo syntax is going to be changing once more, and this time, I really
think/hope it'll be the last time. We plan on stabilizing Eo and all of
the functions on top of it in the next few months, so that doesn't leave
us much more time to change it again. :)
These changes will remove the
