Re: [E-devel] Enlightenement Break

2018-05-27 Thread Daniel Zaoui
On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:55:02 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:37:13 +0100 Al Poole said: > > > Hi raster, > > > > The commit: > > > > 757f7a7279e97e80ccb4defa986c174daaf9449e > > > > Breaks module loading on FreeBSD. > > > > Lots of unresolved symbols w

[E-devel] latest efl lifecycle commits (from cedric)

2018-05-27 Thread The Rasterman
i've been dreading updating e1fl for the past few days. the dread proved founded. the short version: the batch below is pretty horrible. it leaves enlightenment glitching with garbage windows after a desktop switch or a second or 2. it makes enlightenment's restarts significantly slower (like from

Re: [E-devel] latest efl lifecycle commits (from cedric)

2018-05-27 Thread Stephen Houston
Okay this is certainly not ideal, but try not to over react here calling everything horrible and somehow deducing something crazy like not reviewing patches is somehow better than reviewing patches. Let's give Cedric a chance to clean it up. On Sun, May 27, 2018, 3:55 AM Carsten Haitzler wrote:

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenement Break

2018-05-27 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Sun, 27 May 2018 11:51:31 + Daniel Zaoui said: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:55:02 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:37:13 +0100 Al Poole said: > > > > > Hi raster, > > > > > > The commit: > > > > > > 757f7a7279e97e80ccb4defa986c174daaf9449e > >

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenement Break

2018-05-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 27 May 2018 19:46:44 +0530 Amitesh Singh said: > Hey guys > > I tried the latest git e/efl. E is broken. All I get is a lonely cursor. :( > I had included raster's recent revert patch but no avail. > > Any suggestions? see my other mail (latest efl lifecycle commits) and go back to 00

Re: [E-devel] latest efl lifecycle commits (from cedric)

2018-05-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 27 May 2018 08:23:49 -0500 Stephen Houston said: > Okay this is certainly not ideal, but try not to over react here calling > everything horrible and somehow deducing something crazy like not reviewing > patches is somehow better than reviewing patches. Let's give Cedric a > chance to cl