On 7/29/07, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Isn't it about time to shut down the edevelop forums? Almost all posts
> are spam now. Maybe add a link or refer to the new forums?
edevelop.org now redirects to enlightenment.org. I have a copy of the
database that was made jus
On May 2, 2006, at 12:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-I have written things which are incorrect/obsolete
The section you have about EDB is fairly obsolete. I don't know if
it should even be mentioned because only a couple things in CVS still
use it, and they only use it because they hav
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Laurence Vanek wrote:
Blake B. wrote:
Try sending a patch instead of repeating your bug report, it'll
get more response. ;)
-Blake
Thanks for the guidance.
[1] I did not write the code nor am I responsible for it.
Only 1 person did. NASA, look i
On Apr 18, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Laurence Vanek wrote:
Laurence Vanek wrote:
I hate to mention this yet again but latest build of calendar
module still reverts year from "2006" to "106" at midnite each
day. Unloading & re-enabling manually gives correct display
(until date changes).
Im bu
Thanks, though the library doesn't belong in the -dev package. I'll
add the others if someone doesn't beat me to it.
-Blake
On Apr 13, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Jens Taprogge wrote:
Attached please find a couple of Debian fixes.
Best Regards
Jens Taporgge
-
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:42 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Friday, 07 April 2006, at 15:39:01 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
i have also remove the config for the cock
*bites tongue*
I for one have no intention of ever touching his cock module.
-Blake
---
Technically it doesn't matter. Sometimes it's useful to run debian/
rules as a script and some people use this. I don't, and I don't
think it's generally used anymore as things like dpkg-buildpackage
and friends are recommended.
Since it's been requested, sure, go ahead.
-Blake
On Apr 4
Sorry for the self-reply. I just want to clarify that I'm not
referring to kiwi specifically at all.
-Blake
On Mar 30, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Blake B. wrote:
On Mar 30, 2006, at 6:59 AM, Brian Mattern wrote:
As far as granting dev access, I'm all for the more the merrier.
But,
On Mar 30, 2006, at 6:59 AM, Brian Mattern wrote:
As far as granting dev access, I'm all for the more the merrier.
But, we used
to have a "send in some (good) patches for a while, and we'll
eventually get
sick of committing them and grant you access" policy. So, does
"here I wrote
this mod
On Mar 30, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
ok. i think i might have to poke my finger into it all too - i
notice some
totally outrageous "build requirements" (ecore REQUIRES
libdiretfb? no -
it's optional and i don't think we should be shipping it as then
the fi
a while, I imagine you'd need 3 or 4 new vitriolic e-bawt messages. :)
-Blake
On Mar 29, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 March 2006, at 07:30:02 (-0800),
Blake B. wrote:
and DNS round-robin is too tricky with possible synchronization
issues.
Not really if we
On Mar 29, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Vlad Alyukov wrote:
EC> changelog.cin ... errr... not right.
EC> do the people doing debian packaging... actually test things?
There were some half-baked commits just before CVS was taken down. I
hope to clean it up this week and get all packages building fo
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:55:09 -0800 Ben Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How much bandwidth would it take to run a mirror? My university LUG
has plenty of disk space, but I'd
All these have been fixed in my tree, I'm waiting for the CVS move to
happen before committing them.
-Blake
On Mar 20, 2006, at 10:39 PM, Vlad Alyukov wrote:
e17%>cvs diff -3u libs/embryo/debian/changelog.in
Index: libs/embryo/debian/changelog.in
My email is in most of the packages for a reason. :) You should
have asked about the build process from the beginning and we could
have avoided all this. The packages are currently setup to build
using a "make dist" tarball. This allows for "official" packages
that are ready to go to de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've debianized a few packages (e from yesterday's CVS for example) which have
nothing in the /debian directory for the moment.
To the debian developpers/maintainers of e17 : if you are interested I can help to build/keep updated some /debian directories.
Which applic
These are both fixed in CVS.
-Blake
Dave Andruczyk wrote:
I checked out the E17 CVS to see what's in there andfound a couple bugs that
hungup the compiles..
in lib/ewl/data/themes/default/bits/entry-groups.edc
Change line 30 from:
name, "base";
to:
name", "border";
Wouldn't compi
Here's the patch I sent previously with a fix to make it run again as
well. In diff -u format. ;)
-Blake
? config.cache
? elapse.diff
? src/stamp-h
? src/stamp-h.in
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/misc/elap
Patch to make elapse compile after the esmart changes.
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/misc/elapse/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -r1.1 configure.in
52c52
< esmart_libs=`esmart-config --libs`
---
19 matches
Mail list logo
