Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2006-01-02 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 23:11 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > > *** IT'S A BIG, AN AMASING MISTAKE THAT CRIPLE THE RESPECT YOU OUGHT FOR THE > > WORK YOU'VE DONE > > > The configuration file changes are undoubtedly annoying in a highly > customized setup when you expect things to work entirely wi

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-23 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:48, Morten Nilsen wrote: > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > I can stick with 0.17 if this can't be fixed. There are a few > > annoyances with the way the title bar sometimes gets corrupted that > > appear to be a lot better in pre1, but otherwise, I c

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-23 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
> On 12/21/05, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It can still be found here: > > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/e/en/enlightenment > > Could you please try that as well? The link's there, but none of the mirrors appear to still have the file =O( So I moved as

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-22 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > IIRC, SunRay's require using Xsun still. So he wouldn't have the > composite extension available, but Xorg is often installed so it may > be compiled with support for composite. > > On 12/21/05, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-21 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 21:26, Kim Woelders wrote: > > On Solaris Nevada on my x64 laptop, it works fine. On a SunRay running > > off a SPARC-based server running the same Solaris release, with both > > 0.20 and now this pre1, on starting I'd get the split screen, the 2 > > progress meters at the to

[E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-20 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 23:45, Kim Woelders wrote: > Bug reports are welcome. Sorry, I can't as yet figure out if this is a bug or me... On Solaris Nevada on my x64 laptop, it works fine. On a SunRay running off a SPARC-based server running the same Solaris release, with both 0.20 and now this pre

[E-devel] Re: [e-users] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 00:45 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > It may be a bit late for this, e17 lurking just around the corner, but > it looks like there still are a handful of e16 users out there. Given that e17 still only appears to work on Linux, and not the other Unixes out there (is that still t

Re: [E-devel] e16 configuration stored by DISPLAY number... Ummm....

2005-04-04 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 15:08, Kim Woelders wrote: > I have added a command line option (-p ) and environment > variable (ECONFNAME) to set the first part of the configuration file > name. The screen number is still appended, so the configuration files > are named -.* > > Does that cover your needs?

[E-devel] e16 configuration stored by DISPLAY number... Ummm....

2005-04-01 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi, OK, I went on enough yesterday, and this is really amazing - it's a SunRay, but the transparency is working great, and it transparent move is faster than on my old SB150. But I have one problem. It's a SunRay. So every time I log in, I get a display number depending on which user I am. I'm

Re: [E-devel] e16.8 snapshots

2005-03-31 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 18:19, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > 178 ]setenv LD_PRELOAD /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 > 179 ]imlib2_test > > works... So why is it getting built with headers I'm not aware I > have... OK, so I re-made the png loader libraries, forcing them to use the older png li

Re: [E-devel] e16.8 snapshots

2005-03-31 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 17:54, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 17:48, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > > Now, just because you don't have multiple copies of the png.h header, > > that doesn't mean you don't have multiple libpng's installed. It > > s

Re: [E-devel] e16.8 snapshots

2005-03-31 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 17:48, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > There may be some endian issues left in imlib2, but it has been tested > pretty thoroughly. It's been used extensively by people on PPC and > Sparc systems. > > Now, just because you don't have multiple copies of the png.h header, > that doesn

RE: [E-devel] e16.8 snapshots

2005-03-31 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 16:15, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > Just to add to the debate, I just built the same two snapshot files on > Solaris 10.1_11/x64 on my Ferrari laptop, and it all works great. > Somewhat confused as to the cause now =O( Just about everything above > the kernel

Re: [E-devel] e16.8 snapshots

2005-03-31 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 15:17, Kim Woelders wrote: > I have uploaded some e16.8 snapshots to > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2 OK, I'm currently trying to build this on SunOS 5.10.1_10/SPARC, and I have to say the build process for both Imlib2 and then e16 was completely clea

RE: [E-devel] e16.8 snapshots

2005-03-31 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Just to add to the debate, I just built the same two snapshot files on Solaris 10.1_11/x64 on my Ferrari laptop, and it all works great. Somewhat confused as to the cause now =O( Just about everything above the kernel is identical. Except this time I had --prefix=/usr/local... Ta, -- o o

Re: [E-devel] E Summary 16-03-2005

2005-03-18 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 00:39, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > ... java wants to think like window > gdi/mac where a window can position itself completely and is in control of its > own geometry. there is no window manager in windows or mac - at all. the > toolkit > (like gtk/qt - but on window or mac) ha

Re: [E-devel] E Summary 16-03-2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:20, Morten Nilsen wrote: > no, I'm talking about e16.. > > simple testcase (azureus); > > right click any list > select column setup > if ok, dismiss else goto 1 > > on my system only the first dialogue works, all that follow exhibit the > problem. I'll give this a go w

Re: [E-devel] E Summary 16-03-2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:56, Andrew Elcock wrote: > > so it pack()s the first dialogue it opens, but not the subsequent ones? > > maybe, would have to check the source to be sure :) > > I know that eclipse suffered from this, but they noted the bugs and added it I *can* add that while I was stil

Re: [E-devel] E Summary 16-03-2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 15:14, Morten Nilsen wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> We actually discussed this a couple of years ago on this alias. The > >> Java developers had to do this to make things work at all on some WMs. > >> I believe early Gnome and CDE specifically had bugs

Re: [E-devel] E Summary 16-03-2005

2005-03-17 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 04:49, dan sinclair wrote: > E17 and Java > > Tried to use Java in E17 and had some wacky stuff happen? Well, it seems > that Sun did some silly things with Java's X code and explicitly checks > the window manager and behaves differently with each WM (cudos to > H

[E-devel] Thanks Ben...

2004-11-18 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
http://www.cuddletech.com/sun/fink.shtml I and many of my colleagues thank you ;O) Ta, -- o o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /v\ark R. Bowyerhttp://mark.thebowyers.me.uk[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-' --- /"\ ...fingerprint = 79

Re: [E-devel] Gmail accounts, anyone?

2004-10-13 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 08:00, Gen Zhang wrote: > Sorry to be completely off topic. But I've still got a few gmail > invites left, so I thought, what better place to give them away than > my favourite project...? So, anyone up for some? FIFS, obviously. You need to see today's http://userfriendly.or

Re: [E-devel] E DR16.7-pre1 for Solaris10/Sparc. Testers needed.

2004-05-07 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 16:58, Kim Woelders wrote: > I have tried quite a lot of killing and restarting without being able to > reproduce this. However, when E is restarted after a segv, this happens > from within a signal handler and I can imagine there could be some > Solaris/Linux differences here

Re: [E-devel] E DR16.7-pre1 for Solaris10/Sparc. Testers needed.

2004-05-04 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:27, Ben Rockwood wrote: > I'm happy to report the first non-Linux build of DR16.7-pre1 is out and > ready for use. This is a build for Solaris10 (yes, it's a beta OS) on > Sparc. Well, I just upgraded to Solaris 10_58, and once I was sure that was stable, I pulled over t

Re: [E-devel] E-16.6_pre6 Issues

2003-09-02 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:58, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > (2) Bad: Once again, I'm not sure why this happened but when I minimised a > couple of windows I could see them disappearing in an animated fashion off > the right hand side of the screen somewhere to the point where they were no > longer

Re: [E-devel] E-16.6_pre6 Issues

2003-08-29 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 10:58, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > (2) Bad: Once again, I'm not sure why this happened but when I minimised a > couple of windows I could see them disappearing in an animated fashion off > the right hand side of the screen somewhere to the point where they were no > longer

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 16:01, Michael Jennings wrote: > Feel free to modify setup-gettext.sh to resolve the portability > issues. Yeah, I've been looking into that. But Solaris's gettext and the GNU one seem so entirely different - like --version just gets repeated out as input, it doesn't elicit

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 14:45, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > But it installs fine and works this way - except for my continuing > iconify to iconbox issue =O} And that (he says, wishing he'd tried this before he sent this last email, so he wouldn't be replying to himself) only

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 14:18, Kim Woelders wrote: > Sorry, I meant ./autogen.sh --prefix=/opt Ahhh! OK, retried, and yes - that works fine =O) Many thanks. I also looked closer at the po/intl problem, as I noticed this at the end of the ./configure output: creating po/Makefile.in

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 14:02, Kim Woelders wrote: > > I did a ./autogen.sh --prefix=/opt/enlightenment --enable-fsstd here and > > it did mostly what I wanted. Stuff is now in /opt/enlightenment/share/* > > that used to be in /opt/enlightenment/*, but I can live with that. > > > I think you want .

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-16 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 19:39, Kim Woelders wrote: > OK - I have just committed an attempt to make things work in the > "good old" way. > > Could everybody who cares please try out their pet configuartion :-) I did a ./autogen.sh --prefix=/opt/enlightenment --enable-fsstd here and it did mostly wha

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-15 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
d (intended) default behavior one would have to do > something like: > > configure --bindir=/usr/local/enlightenment/bin --datadir=/usr/local > > /Kim > > > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 22:25, Kim Woelders wrote: > > > >>Morten Ni

Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

2003-07-14 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 22:25, Kim Woelders wrote: > Morten Nilsen wrote: > > if configure is run without parameters, prefix is set to /usr/local > > enlightenment expects it's binaries to be in prefix/enlightenment/bin, > > while they get installed in prefix/bin > > > > giving configure --enable-fs

Re: [E-devel] e16.6-pre3 is out

2003-06-09 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Hi, OK, quick run-down on getting this running on Solaris10/SPARC. First point is - it does =O) and the Window List and stuff all works on latest Solaris with latest Sun-built Gnome =O) Many, Many thanks =O) OK, what I had to do: a) On Solaris, $YACC in the Makefiles for some reason was set t

Re: [E-devel] Re: enlightenment-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1285 - 6 msgs

2003-01-23 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 22:05, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > aah there i the rub. here in the land of oz, > pants = trousers. > underpants = underwear > underdacks = underpants > dacks = underdacks > undies = dacks > panties = undies for girls > knickers = some silly word foreign people use > > so...

[E-devel] Re: enlightenment-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1285 - 6 msgs

2003-01-21 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
Just saw raster's update to the News site in the CVS log... +@:news_body@ + +For all E junkies there are now PANTS ON T-shirts available +http://www.cafeshops.com/e_pants>Here. Remember to keep your +pants on while using Enlightenment. It can be dangerous not to. This was +just too good to leave a