On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:13:43PM +0100, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Dave Andreoli wrote:
> > 2010/3/18 Enlightenment SVN
> >
> >> Log:
> >> evas: mega documentation improving commit.
> >>
> >> This commit moves Evas.h contents a lot, but it should not change code
> >
Ping?
Would it be more convenient to send the patch and test programs directly to
the list? (I know people usually do this, but since it's a number of files, I
figured it might be cumbersome.)
pete
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:51:01PM -0500, Peter Johnson wrote:
> Here's a tarball
few second pairs of eyes on
it. Thanks.
pete
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 05:18:10PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Peter Johnson wrote:
> > Cool, thanks.
> >
> > My reading of those pages indicates that, were I to follow the
> > reco
whatnot.
pete
(My apologies if this has already been discussed.)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 07:48:29PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Peter Johnson wrote:
>
> >>really, there is already logging infrastructure there in ecore-x, if
> >>he wants
> really, there is already logging infrastructure there in ecore-x, if
> he wants another "domain", just create a new one and name macros
> differently, but use the standards and let's not require people to
> change private.h to define or not the debug :-/
Where is this documented?
-
