Hi,
On 18 March 2016 at 00:03, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> It's been over a week with no reply and this is still broken after your
> revert. If there continues to be no compelling evidence supporting the
> revert, the patch will go back in next week.
>
Mike's patch here indeed breaks enventor's
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:39 AM Jean-Philippe André
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18 March 2016 at 00:03, Mike Blumenkrantz <
> michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > It's been over a week with no reply and this is still broken after your
> > revert. If there continues to be no compelling evidence
It's been over a week with no reply and this is still broken after your
revert. If there continues to be no compelling evidence supporting the
revert, the patch will go back in next week.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM Mike Blumenkrantz <
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am conf
Hi,
I am confused by this.
Here are some screenshots of the only ctxpopup test which looks different
between these commits.
This is how it looks with your revert: http://i.imgur.com/tlIdBDU.png
This is how it looked before the revert: http://i.imgur.com/RrT4iXL.png
Unless the goal is for horizon
Hey, Mike I reverted your patch.
Since this broke enventor auto completion feature as well as ctxpopup example
in elementary_test.
We need to figure them out before applying this patch.
-Original Message-
From: "Hermet Park"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2016-03-08 (화) 21:00:29
Subject: [EGIT] [co
