Congratulations!
All the people in this community did the good job!
I hope E will be distributed a lot and be popular.
And I hope elementary 1.0 will be released soon!
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> Finally after a lkong time coming,
Em 29-01-2011 09:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) escreveu:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
>>> wrote:
>>>
s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SV
On 01/29/2011 02:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 release
> of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). This has been
> many years coming. The following libraries have been released:
>
> * E
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:53:14 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at
Firstofall: Congratulations to everyone in the community espescially
the developers :-)
2011/1/29 Vincent Torri :
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
>>
>> said:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Haco
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> > wrote:
> >
> >> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that.
> >> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Umm...I meant if someone forgets to update the changelog when they should
> have
> we can email them...
>
>
My problem is with svn enforcement, not with making sure we update the
changelog.
--
Tom.
--
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:39:57 +0200
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, we can just point it out and they can fix it.
> >
> >
> I'm not sure I quite get you. Lets say I want to do a minor documentation
> fix, do you really
> want s
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that.
It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this
annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Alternatively, we can just point it out and they can fix it.
>
>
I'm not sure I quite get you. Lets say I want to do a minor documentation
fix, do you really
want svn to force me edit the changelog as well?!
--
Tom.
---
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:32:50 +0200
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> wrote:
>
> > s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that.
> > It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this
> > annoying vtorri guy and his chang
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that.
> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this
> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours.
>
>
I disagree. You don't want to
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
2011/1/29 Vincent Torri :
Hey
now that the EFL are release, maybe we should apply the patches ONLY if
the ChangeLog is updated (if needed). Otherwise the patch is reverted. Do
you agree ?
s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actuall
2011/1/29 Vincent Torri :
>
> Hey
>
> now that the EFL are release, maybe we should apply the patches ONLY if
> the ChangeLog is updated (if needed). Otherwise the patch is reverted. Do
> you agree ?
>
s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that.
It's probably a good idea, otherwis
Hey
now that the EFL are release, maybe we should apply the patches ONLY if
the ChangeLog is updated (if needed). Otherwise the patch is reverted. Do
you agree ?
Vincent
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:43:25 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrot
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:43:25 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0
> release of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4).
> This has been many years coming. The following libraries have been
> release
Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 release
of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). This has been
many years coming. The following libraries have been released:
* Eina - 1.0.0
* Eet - 1.4.0
* Evas - 1.0.0
* Ecore - 1.0.0
*
18 matches
Mail list logo
