Re: [E-devel] 1.14 release cycle schedule proposal

2015-02-09 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 03/02/15 14:48, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. 1.13 should only be a week away so its time to see if we are all happy with the schedule for 1.14. My proposal looks like this: 2015-02-09 Merge window for 1.14 opens 2015-03-30 Notice about soon ending merge window 2015-04-06 Merge

Re: [E-devel] 1.14 release cycle schedule proposal

2015-02-03 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 04/02/15 02:24, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: Hi, thanks for the 1.14 release cycle suggestion. I am ok with 4 weeks but we didn't use those 4 weeks usefully as we still have a lot of pending tasks IMO. Need to find a better way of handling it. I'm open for suggestions how we can

[E-devel] 1.14 release cycle schedule proposal

2015-02-03 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. 1.13 should only be a week away so its time to see if we are all happy with the schedule for 1.14. My proposal looks like this: 2015-02-09 Merge window for 1.14 opens 2015-03-30 Notice about soon ending merge window 2015-04-06 Merge window is over. * Only bug fixes from this point *

Re: [E-devel] 1.14 release cycle schedule proposal

2015-02-03 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 03/02/15 13:48, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. 1.13 should only be a week away so its time to see if we are all happy with the schedule for 1.14. My proposal looks like this: 2015-02-09 Merge window for 1.14 opens 2015-03-30 Notice about soon ending merge window 2015-04-06 Merge window

Re: [E-devel] 1.14 release cycle schedule proposal

2015-02-03 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 03/02/15 14:57, Tom Hacohen wrote: On 03/02/15 13:48, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. 1.13 should only be a week away so its time to see if we are all happy with the schedule for 1.14. My proposal looks like this: 2015-02-09 Merge window for 1.14 opens 2015-03-30 Notice about

Re: [E-devel] 1.14 release cycle schedule proposal

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Hi, thanks for the 1.14 release cycle suggestion. I am ok with 4 weeks but we didn't use those 4 weeks usefully as we still have a lot of pending tasks IMO. Need to find a better way of handling it. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Stefan Schmidt