On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:05:06 + Tom Hacohen said:
> On 05/02/15 23:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:38 + Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> On 04/02/15 23:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:11:28 + Tom Hacohen
On 05/02/15 23:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:38 + Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 04/02/15 23:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:11:28 + Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
Hey,
If there are no objections, I'd li
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:38 + Tom Hacohen said:
> On 04/02/15 23:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:11:28 + Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> If there are no objections, I'd like to deprecate eina_tmpstr_strlen()
> >> and create eina_tmpst
On 04/02/15 23:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:11:28 + Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> If there are no objections, I'd like to deprecate eina_tmpstr_strlen()
>> and create eina_tmpstr_len() that is unlike the former, not crazily
>> confusing and error pro
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:11:28 + Tom Hacohen said:
> Hey,
>
> If there are no objections, I'd like to deprecate eina_tmpstr_strlen()
> and create eina_tmpstr_len() that is unlike the former, not crazily
> confusing and error prone.
>
> With a name like *_strlen() you'd expect a function wou
Yes, it accepts the len as strlen (real strlen) and then they add it
inside, but for the user, add_length gets a different len than you get back
from tmpstr_strlen().
:(
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Hirt
wrote:
> Nah, it does "length += 1" beforehand (there's a comment in code),
> an
Nah, it does "length += 1" beforehand (there's a comment in code),
and just after that does "s->length = length";
Agreeing with your suggestion, but let's keep this for 1.14+ and not a
few days before release :)
On 02/04/2015 02:28 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 04/02/15 12:11, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
On 04/02/15 12:11, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> If there are no objections, I'd like to deprecate eina_tmpstr_strlen()
> and create eina_tmpstr_len() that is unlike the former, not crazily
> confusing and error prone.
>
> With a name like *_strlen() you'd expect a function would behave like
> strl
Hey,
If there are no objections, I'd like to deprecate eina_tmpstr_strlen()
and create eina_tmpstr_len() that is unlike the former, not crazily
confusing and error prone.
With a name like *_strlen() you'd expect a function would behave like
strlen(), alas, it behaves like "strlen() + 1". This
