On 3/27/07, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The minimum size I've found that has a legible font across platforms
> is setting the main div to 0.9em. Anything below that causes severe
> shape loss on OS X with the Vera font.
Actually, I think that the normal thing to do is to use 1
The minimum size I've found that has a legible font across platforms
is setting the main div to 0.9em. Anything below that causes severe
shape loss on OS X with the Vera font.
On 3/25/07, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have to disagree on this. The sizing is completely out of th
Hi there,
I'm glad that finally there is a chance I can find more info about EFL and E
in the same place... So it doesn't really matter how big or small the fonts
are at this very moment; let's have the site up and running, "patches" can
be applied later :)
Lucian
On 3/26/07, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Hughart schreef:
> My take on the situation, just use pixel sizes. I use them all the
> time and they provide almost 100% consistent results while still
> allowing the browser to resize them just fine. Using em, pt, or % is
> just too inconsiste
My take on the situation, just use pixel sizes. I use them all the
time and they provide almost 100% consistent results while still
allowing the browser to resize them just fine. Using em, pt, or % is
just too inconsistent for my tastes.
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:05:12 -0300
"Gustavo Sverzut Barbie
good, I thought raster was only making me feel old. Glad I'm not the
only one!
--Inc
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions
On 3/25/07, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and others think they are just right. i personally think they are a bit big.
> have you perhaps ever considered modifying your preferences to increase the
> font
> size? these preferences DO exist for a reason. (desired font
On 03/25/2007 19:05, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On 3/25/07, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:24:34 +0200 Martin Sarajervi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
> On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 25
Well, the problem seems to be the paragraphs are set to "0.7em" when
(supposedly, by the w3c) main content text should never go under 1em.
in my experience, setting the font size in body { } to 76% then using "em" in
the rest of the site (going under 1 only for very specific styles of text)
ren
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:24:34 +0200 Martin Sarajervi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
> On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:08:03 -0500 (EST) Enlightenment CVS
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> > That isn't REAL content - it's dumm
On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:08:03 -0500 (EST) Enlightenment CVS
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> That isn't REAL content - it's dummy content waiting to be fixed :)
>
If I may The fonts are really small. My eyes hurt when t
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:08:03 -0500 (EST) Enlightenment CVS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
That isn't REAL content - it's dummy content waiting to be fixed :)
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : devilhorns
> Project : web
> Module : www
>
> Dir : web/www/p/docs
>
>
> Modified Files:
12 matches
Mail list logo
