Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-28 Thread BAM
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 18:54, Kim Woelders wrote: > > Would you please tell me what's wrong with my patch now instead of that > > one throwaway line? > > > Just did a quick test of the patch. I think I found a few issues: Yes! > - The second key doesn't work when a modifier is given. I'll look i

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-28 Thread Kim Woelders
BAM wrote: OK, everybody, I never meant to cast aspirations on E, I apologize for doing so, and throw myself on the mercy of the court. Hey, I think it's nice when somebody besides me does some hacking at E16 :-) If the feature works and is useful I see no reason not to include it in E16.7. Would

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-28 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:23:21 -0500 BAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 16:46, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:54:08 -0500 BAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > >

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 16:46, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:54:08 -0500 BAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > > using pekwm. > > i might be inclined to rephrase that as "due to xnest being unstable and bugg

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:54:08 -0500 BAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > using pekwm. i might be inclined to rephrase that as "due to xnest being unstable and buggy, i decided to change software unrelated to it

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 08:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 27 October 2003 07:54, BAM wrote: > > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > > using pekwm. > > i use xnest over here w/out any bugs ... > -mike I don't use debian, but this guy had the same problem:

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 27 October 2003 07:54, BAM wrote: > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > using pekwm. i use xnest over here w/out any bugs ... -mike pgp0.pgp Description: signature

[E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself using pekwm. Don't think I'll switch my main desktops, but there are two features I really like: tabs and keychains/maps (like C-x or C-c in Emacs). Keymapping was easier to write, so here goes. This is just a simple first effo