On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:55:14 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>
> >>> O
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
>>> said:
>>>
Hey
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> >>
> >> Hey
> >>
> >> we are deleting the .la files for the mempool modules. I think t
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> we are deleting the .la files for the mempool modules. I think that we
>> should provide them. It's the packager of the distro who has to decide
>> wh
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
> Hey
>
> we are deleting the .la files for the mempool modules. I think that we
> should provide them. It's the packager of the distro who has to decide
> whether or not to delete it.
>
> What do you think ?
only for installed
Hey
we are deleting the .la files for the mempool modules. I think that we
should provide them. It's the packager of the distro who has to decide
whether or not to delete it.
What do you think ?
Vincent
--
Fulfilling