Re: [E-devel] Error compiling evas 1.7.7 on CentOS 5.9

2013-07-17 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:56:47 -0400 Enlightenment developer list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: I am getting an error compiling evas 1.7.7 under CentOS 5.9: gollum.deepsoft.com% rpm -qa gcc\* binutils glibc\* autoconf\* libX11 autoconf-2.59-12

Re: [E-devel] Error compiling evas 1.7.7 on CentOS 5.9

2013-07-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:36:11 -0400 Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com said: At Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:56:47 -0400 Enlightenment developer list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: first... dont --enable-software-16-x11 ... we already removed it in git (wont be in 1.8) and no one

Re: [E-devel] Error compiling evas

2006-01-28 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:16:14 +0100 Martin Klaffenboeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: evas_engine.c: In function `evas_engine_buffer_output_setup': evas_engine.c:294: error: `EVAS_ENGINE_BUFFER_DEPTH_RGB32' undeclared (first use in this function) evas_engine.c:294: error: (Each undeclared

Re: [E-devel] Error compiling evas

2006-01-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 27 January 2006 12:00, Tiago Victor Gehring wrote: I supose you're using gentoo, in this case: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-426435-highlight-error+evas.html well he did open with using gentoo ;) I had the same problem here, but just a make clean before compiling solved the

Re: [E-devel] Error compiling evas

2006-01-27 Thread David Seikel
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:07:33 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 27 January 2006 12:00, Tiago Victor Gehring wrote: I supose you're using gentoo, in this case: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-426435-highlight-error+evas.html well he did open with using gentoo ;)

Re: [E-devel] Error compiling evas

2006-01-27 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Am Freitag, den 27.01.2006, 15:00 -0200 schrieb Tiago Victor Gehring: I supose you're using gentoo, in this case: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-426435-highlight-error+evas.html I had the same problem here, but just a make clean before compiling solved the problem. This one appears