On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:58:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Cedric, AFAIU the number of API is short, just leave the old in place
> and add a new one. Mark the old as deprecated. At least it won't crash
> due dynamic linker not finding the symbol
if we just change the current api to use
Cedric, AFAIU the number of API is short, just leave the old in place
and add a new one. Mark the old as deprecated. At least it won't crash
due dynamic linker not finding the symbol
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Davide Andreoli
> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> 2014-03-13 3:14 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL :
>> There is an open review https://phab.enlightenment.org/D562 that raise
>> a good point. The current API is not correct and don't let Edje_Edit
>> change edje value accurately (lost of precision). C
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:26:03 +0100 Davide Andreoli
said:
> 2014-03-13 3:14 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > There is an open review https://phab.enlightenment.org/D562 that raise
> > a good point. The current API is not correct and don't let Edje_Edit
> > change edje value accurately
2014-03-13 3:14 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL :
> Hello,
>
> There is an open review https://phab.enlightenment.org/D562 that raise
> a good point. The current API is not correct and don't let Edje_Edit
> change edje value accurately (lost of precision). Changing the type of
> the parameter will be an ABI
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> Congratulations Cedric, you have been promoted from git b0rker to ABI
> b0rker. Remember, with great power comes great ice cream.
Yeah, ice cream ! \o/ I am sure it would motivate Hermet to bork more :-D
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:19:28 +090
Congratulations Cedric, you have been promoted from git b0rker to ABI
b0rker. Remember, with great power comes great ice cream.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:19:28 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:54:23 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> that was my poin
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:54:23 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
that was my point in the phab comments... edje_edit was not meant to be stable
and to be used by ordinary apps/people. it was a specific api added to expose
internals to help write edje editors... and editors are very much tied to
edje_edit is unstable... I recall we even request a #define to include it, no?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is an open review https://phab.enlightenment.org/D562 that raise
> a good point. The current API is not correct and don't let Edje_Edit
> change e
Hello,
There is an open review https://phab.enlightenment.org/D562 that raise
a good point. The current API is not correct and don't let Edje_Edit
change edje value accurately (lost of precision). Changing the type of
the parameter will be an ABI break, but the only application that
should use thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
