On 18/02/13 18:41, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:36:50AM +, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 18/02/13 09:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit
message.
That should be way more
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit message.
That should be way more useful.
Thanks.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to think you guys would like
to see the whole diff in the title.
--
Tom.
ignore him, just make it as close to the previous svn mail subjects as
possible.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.comwrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit
message.
That should be
On 18/02/13 09:26, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
ignore him, just make it as close to the previous svn mail subjects as
possible.
I never ignore SeoZ, but I'll disregard his suggestion here. I was
planning on just making it the same as SVN was.
--
Tom.
On 18/02/2013 10:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit message.
That should be way more useful.
Thanks.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to think you guys would like
to see the whole diff in
Hello.
On 18/02/13 09:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit
message.
That should be way more useful.
Thanks.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to think you guys would like
to see the
On 18/02/13 09:36, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 18/02/13 09:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit
message.
That should be way more useful.
Thanks.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting
maybe he's writing a mail about it so that I can read it from my quarantine
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.comwrote:
On 18/02/13 09:36, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 18/02/13 09:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:45:54 + Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
I was just joking... You are seating by my side, if it wasn't for the
huge noise-cancelling headphones you have on your head, you've heard
me and Daniel talking about it 10 minutes ago.
lol
--
A big old stinking
On 18/02/13 01:14, ChunEon Park wrote:
Could it possible to make git mail title messages to be more meaningful?
i.e) [core/efl] xxxmaster updated. f27ff2fbf31a01c2f8d98e773bed6cc4298749bd
- [core/efl/evas] xxxmaster updated.
f27ff2fbf31a01c2f8d98e773bed6cc4298749bd
I think after some
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 18/02/13 01:14, ChunEon Park wrote:
Could it possible to make git mail title messages to be more meaningful?
i.e) [core/efl] xxxmaster updated. f27ff2fbf31a01c2f8d98e773bed6cc4298749bd
- [core/efl/evas]
On 18/02/13 10:07, Ivan Briano wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Are we in favour of sending mails for all branches or just for master?
Anything else I missed?
Once we have backporting branches in git too it might be useful to have
mails
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:58:55 + Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
said:
On 18/02/13 01:14, ChunEon Park wrote:
Could it possible to make git mail title messages to be more meaningful?
i.e) [core/efl] xxxmaster updated. f27ff2fbf31a01c2f8d98e773bed6cc4298749bd
- [core/efl/evas]
On 18/02/13 10:07, Iván Briano wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 18/02/13 01:14, ChunEon Park wrote:
Could it possible to make git mail title messages to be more meaningful?
i.e) [core/efl] xxxmaster updated.
On 16/02/13 06:42, Jérôme Pinot wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that this is not a poll, but I particularly prefer rebased
branches/commits too.
LWN has a neat article about the git rebase thing:
http://lwn.net/Articles/328436/
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Jérôme Pinot ngc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/16/13 15:58, David Seikel wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 14
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:36:50AM +, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 18/02/13 09:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/02/13 04:02, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit
message.
That should be way more useful.
Thanks.
Correct me
that was changed, it would be
better to know what is changed in abstractly.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: David Seikelonef...@gmail.com
To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Cc:
Sent: 2013-02-16 (토) 16:19:58
Subject: Re: [E-devel] SVN-Git Migration
.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: David Seikelonef...@gmail.com
To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
Cc:
Sent: 2013-02-16 (토) 16:19:58
Subject: Re: [E-devel] SVN-Git Migration (was: (no subject))
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:42:46 +0900 Jérôme Pinot ngc891@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com wrote:
And it'll be great if the title includes the first line of commit message.
That should be way more useful.
Indeed.
--
Cedric BAIL
--
The
(토) 16:19:58
Subject: Re: [E-devel] SVN-Git Migration (was: (no subject))
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:42:46 +0900 Jérôme Pinot ngc891@gmail.com
wrote:
On 02/16/13 15:58, David Seikel wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
antognolli@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly bdi...@profusion.mobi
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann
d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly bdi...@profusion.mobi
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that this is not a poll, but I particularly prefer rebased
branches/commits too.
me too.
Merges only make
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly
bdi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel
On 02/16/13 15:58, David Seikel wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly
bdi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:42:46 +0900 Jérôme Pinot ngc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 02/16/13 15:58, David Seikel wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:56:06 -0200 Rafael Antognolli
antogno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14/02/13 02:24, David Seikel wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:48:52 + Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 13/02/13 10:42, Daniel Willmann wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann
d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
Topic
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Topic branches:
* In each repository every developer with commit access will be able to
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly bdi...@profusion.mobi
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann
d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann
d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
Topic
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly bdi...@profusion.mobi
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann
d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:04:49 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:53:22 -0200 Bruno Dilly
bdi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:53:22AM -0200, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Topic branches:
* In each
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Topic branches:
* In each repository every developer with commit access will be able to
push/update branches in their own namespace (devs/name/*). These
branches will
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:42:17 + Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
said:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Topic branches:
* In each repository every developer with commit access will be able to
On 13/02/13 10:42, Daniel Willmann wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Topic branches:
* In each repository every developer with commit access will be able to
push/update branches in their own
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:48:52 + Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 13/02/13 10:42, Daniel Willmann wrote:
On 13/02/13 00:36, Bruno Dilly wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Willmann
d.willm...@samsung.com wrote:
Topic branches:
* In each repository every
Hello.
On 12/02/13 05:39, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:46:47 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
seojuyu...@gmail.com
said:
Great! Thanks a lot for your effort.
Btw, non-committers can clone git in the same way?
How they clone git?
obviously they can't clone the
Hi,
On 12/02/13 13:22, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Stefan Schmidt
s.schm...@samsung.comwrote:
Correct. Git protocol is working fine:
git://phab.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git
git://phab.enlightenment.org/core/enlightenment.git
Apologies for the double send, but someone forgot to set the subject
correctly (at all)...
Hello,
beware, the switch to Git will be happening soon! We will migrate efl,
elementary and enlightenment one-by-one and send mails with specific
details when each will happen.
For the time when we are
Great! Thanks a lot for your effort.
Btw, non-committers can clone git in the same way?
How they clone git?
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Daniel Willmann d.willm...@samsung.comwrote:
Apologies for the double send, but someone forgot to set the subject
correctly (at
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:46:47 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com
said:
Great! Thanks a lot for your effort.
Btw, non-committers can clone git in the same way?
How they clone git?
obviously they can't clone the same way... ssh transport will not work for
them. :) they probably can git
42 matches
Mail list logo
