On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:51:54 -0500 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> On 9-Feb-07, at 6:14 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:11:33 -0600 Brian Mattern
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >> Currently we have code to build menus, find ico
On 9-Feb-07, at 6:14 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:11:33 -0600 Brian Mattern
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>> Currently we have code to build menus, find icons, and load desktop
>> entries complete. There are a few things left to finish (most
>> impor
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:11:33 -0600 Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
hidey-ho... here i go - finally responding to this... :)
> After a few weeks of spare-time development, I'd like to announce
> Efreet, a new implementation of the XDG (freedesktop) specs for Icons,
> Menus and Desktop E
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
>
> I want to make it clear, I think it makes sense to have an ecore type
> library to collect common functionality into a central location, but I
> don't think the desktop functionality necessarily belongs there.
The main thing is that this all gets do
On 1/18/07, D. Hageman wrote:
>
> I understand the purpose of libraries. My argument is that there is a
> point of diminishing returns when you put *everything* into its own
> library.
This isn't a discussion about whether everything should be its own
library. It's whether freedesktop support is
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, dan sinclair wrote:
> D. Hageman wrote:
>>
>> I guess the real questions that should be asked:
>>
>> a) How many non-standard libaries does one project need to support their
>> project? At what point are there too many?
>>
>
> Define non-standard. None of the efl librari
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 18:01, dan sinclair wrote:
> D. Hageman wrote:
> > I guess the real questions that should be asked:
> >
> > a) How many non-standard libaries does one project need to support
> > their project? At what point are there too many?
>
> Define non-standard. None of the efl
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:14, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The next question is, assuming you guys see it as a viable replacement
> > for ecore_desktop, do we stick this somewhere in libs (as efreet or
> > e_xdg, or whate
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, DaveMDS wrote:
> dan sinclair ha scritto:
>> Peter Parkanyi wrote:
>>
>> Efreet is more then just menus. It also contains the icon theme code
>> which is used in Ewl. Any other app that want's to use the icons from a
>> given icon theme could use Efreet as well.
>>
>> Along wi
D. Hageman wrote:
>
> I guess the real questions that should be asked:
>
> a) How many non-standard libaries does one project need to support
> their project? At what point are there too many?
>
Define non-standard. None of the efl libraries are 'standards'. We
separate things into librarie
dan sinclair ha scritto:
> Peter Parkanyi wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 15:15, you wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:14, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
>>>
On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The next qu
On 1/17/07, Peter Parkanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd argue on that topic. I think it should go to either ecore or e17. The
> reason: I don't think any app but e uses the freedesktop menu, or if they do
> so, they depend on e itself.
That's an incorrect assumption. EWL currently relies on
Peter Parkanyi wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 15:15, you wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:14, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
The next question is, assuming you guys see it as a viable
Peter Parkanyi wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 15:15, you wrote:
>> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:14, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
>> > On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The next question is, assuming you guys see it as a viable replacement
>> >
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 15:15, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:14, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> > On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The next question is, assuming you guys see it as a viable replacement
> > > for ecore_desktop, do we sti
On 1/17/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The next question is, assuming you guys see it as a viable replacement
> for ecore_desktop, do we stick this somewhere in libs (as efreet or
> e_xdg, or whatever name) or do we cram it in to ecore? My vote is that
> we stop bloating eco
After a few weeks of spare-time development, I'd like to announce
Efreet, a new implementation of the XDG (freedesktop) specs for Icons,
Menus and Desktop Entries.
The current implementation, Ecore_Desktop, while a commendable effort
for a sole developer under time constraints, leaves a bit to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
