thanks a lot
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 10:22, Daniel Willmann wrote :
> On 02/04/13 22:24, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose a tactical repo move from
> > devs/jeyzu/ffi-efl.git to bindings/ruby/ffi-efl.git
> > under the description: Ruby bindings for the EFL,
> > to match the
On 02/04/13 22:24, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> I would like to propose a tactical repo move from
> devs/jeyzu/ffi-efl.git to bindings/ruby/ffi-efl.git
> under the description: Ruby bindings for the EFL,
> to match the python binding one.
Done.
Regards,
Daniel
-
Hi,
as Lennart finally voted against the bzr move…
I would like to propose a tactical repo move from
devs/jeyzu/ffi-efl.git to bindings/ruby/ffi-efl.git
under the description: Ruby bindings for the EFL,
to match the python binding one.
this binding is not widely used, surely not bug free, but wo
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:09:57 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher said:
eina_prefix_* calls... but its not a simple single call (because installation
is not a simple single prefix in all cases). you have to provide a slew of
input info (symbols, magic files, #defined compiled-in locations, argv[0] etc.)
and then
Awesome job!
Thank you.
--
Boris Faure
--
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion
Hi everyone,
I wonder if there is a function somewhere in the efl that could return
the installation prefix path (say '/opt/e17' on my box) ?
btw https://github.com/jeremyz/ffi-efl seems pretty stable and usable right now.
it's tested on ruby 1.9 and 1.8,
uses ffi (foreign function interface) in
