On Tue 15 Jun 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> > I'd *love* a textbox that could evaluate statements as well as just
> > take text directly.
>
> e-macs? : )
The EFL wasn't created for writing yet another OS.
--
Ibukun Olumuyiwa
http://xcomputerman.com
"God is dead." - Nietzche
"Nietz
Shish wrote:
take a look at systems that do
it correctly and take whatever is good from others and implement in e, which
is the obvious thing to do
Also, I think Jef has some good ideas, even if I find the overall thing
impractical - eg I'd *love* a textbox that could evaluate statements as we
> take a look at systems that do
> it correctly and take whatever is good from others and implement in e, which
> is the obvious thing to do
Also, I think Jef has some good ideas, even if I find the overall thing
impractical - eg I'd *love* a textbox that could evaluate statements as well as
just
e are definitly things there that are very
well done, and ways to operate the computer fast.
Greetings
David Fredin
-Original Message-
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:59:18 +0900
From: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [E-devel]
(B> I have read the Jef Raskin's book, The Humane Interface,
(B> Its an analisys of the "conventional GUI", and all the
(B> wrong thins about them.
(B
(Bi am going to have to disagree with some of jef's points... and i think jef is
(Bnot quite living in "reality" (sorry jef - nothing persona
Shish wrote:
I like enlightenment because is not a "clone of", like the other
GUIs of Open Source. Would be nice, to do a radical change in
the Linux interfaces, and e17 its a nice place to start.
Indeed - I like E because it's enough like other WMs that it can be learned
eas
> I like enlightenment because is not a "clone of", like the other
> GUIs of Open Source. Would be nice, to do a radical change in
> the Linux interfaces, and e17 its a nice place to start.
Indeed - I like E because it's enough like other WMs that it can be learned
easily, but then it does everyth
