On 05/01/12 14:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:34:47 +0200
> Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 01/01/12 20:02, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
>>> elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones.
>>>
>>> The ratio
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:34:47 +0200
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 01/01/12 20:02, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
> > elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones.
> >
> > The rationale was the existence of entry_append and other text
On 01/01/12 20:02, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
> elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones.
>
> The rationale was the existence of entry_append and other text
> manipulation functions.
>
> entry_set/get were recently deprecated,
2012/1/2 Michael Blumenkrantz :
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:32:01 +0200
> Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 02/01/12 12:14, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> > i really don't know... i'm torn between them. :/
>> >
>>
>> Same here, I'm also torn. :P
>>
>> That's why I was happy with the old status q
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:32:01 +0200
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 02/01/12 12:14, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > i really don't know... i'm torn between them. :/
> >
>
> Same here, I'm also torn. :P
>
> That's why I was happy with the old status quo (i.e no one deprecated it).
>
> But no
On 02/01/12 12:14, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> i really don't know... i'm torn between them. :/
>
Same here, I'm also torn. :P
That's why I was happy with the old status quo (i.e no one deprecated it).
But now, since I have to choose, I'd have to say, keep em both, but
really, tha
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:38:58 +0200 Tom Hacohen
said:
> On 02/01/12 07:13, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > i can see the logic - i'm waiting for tom to wake up... lazy bugger. i've
> > been awake for hours already and he's still lounging about in bed! :)
>
> Damn you and your timezone
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:32:40 +0200 Tom Hacohen
said:
> On 02/01/12 05:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > well the documentation said they were deprecated but the didn't have
> > EINA_DEPRECATED, so i added it and stuffed them into elm_deprecated.h. there
> > were many examples of thi
On 02/01/12 07:13, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> i can see the logic - i'm waiting for tom to wake up... lazy bugger. i've been
> awake for hours already and he's still lounging about in bed! :)
Damn you and your timezone, *REAL MEN* live in Europe/Africa/Western
Asia/Middle east!
I'
On 02/01/12 05:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> well the documentation said they were deprecated but the didn't have
> EINA_DEPRECATED, so i added it and stuffed them into elm_deprecated.h. there
> were many examples of this (docs say deprecated, no EINA_DEPRECATED).
>
I'm not blaming
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:10:42 +0900
> Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>
>> Hello Tom.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
>> > elm_entry_ent
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 22:13:28 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:10:42 +0900
> Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>
> > Hello Tom.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
> > > el
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 22:13:28 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> also you're only allowed to put in 2 cents at a time unless you're
> raster.
Inflation.
--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:10:42 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello Tom.
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
> > elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones.
>
> I didn't participate in that t
Hello Tom.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
> elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones.
I didn't participate in that talk but why you decided not t deprecate them?
In my opinion, deprecating elm_en
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 20:02:25 +0200 Tom Hacohen said:
> Hey all,
>
> Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate
> elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones.
>
> The rationale was the existence of entry_append and other text
> manipulation functions.
>
> entry_set/get were
16 matches
Mail list logo
