LMAO :)
Well, you know what they say ... If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them :P
dh
On 17/12/12 11:54, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hahahaha that was huge.
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
> michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hahahahaha
Hahahaha that was huge.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hahahahahahahahaha
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, David Seikel wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:22:09 + Christopher Michael
> > wrote:
hahahahahahahahaha
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:22:09 + Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>
> > Please...Lets Squash Some commites ??
>
> Welcome to the SVN spammers club. B-)
>
> --
> A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
> coz th
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:22:09 + Christopher Michael
wrote:
> Please...Lets Squash Some commites ??
Welcome to the SVN spammers club. B-)
--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
People should squash trash commits, yeah, but if the commits are isolated
enough and have enough information in the commit message to justify a split
commit, they should be split.
As Bruno said, if you have a commit per task with a clear commit message,
it's fine.
Actually, there's this one featu
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:12:20 +1100 Mike McCormack
wrote:
> On 11/24/2012 04:31 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> > Right. Each commit should be atomic/clean/lean/simple.
> > +1 to bdilly
> >
> > But having huge amount of commits at once is annoying.
> > It's hard to read/review.
> > +1 to devilhorns
On 11/24/2012 04:31 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Right. Each commit should be atomic/clean/lean/simple.
> +1 to bdilly
>
> But having huge amount of commits at once is annoying.
> It's hard to read/review.
> +1 to devilhorns
Surely smaller commits are easier to review?
Additionally, if a commit
Right. Each commit should be atomic/clean/lean/simple.
+1 to bdilly
But having huge amount of commits at once is annoying.
It's hard to read/review.
+1 to devilhorns
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Bruno Dilly wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Christopher Mich
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> Please...Lets Squash Some commites ??
Are you talking about my work ?
If it's the case: "No, I won't".
My commits are split by tasks, with a clear commit msg (and
explanations when required).
Best regards
> --
> Sent from my Samsun
