Hello,
I'm forwarding this to the list, since it never got there...
Frost suggested a way (that works) to prevent the windows from
bouncing. Even if you are using E 0.16.6
Roberto.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roberto Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:06:12 -0200
Hi,
If you are looking for an ebuild, check out this thread on the gentoo
forums. One of the users has done up a quick ebuild for anyone to try
here's the link http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=256983&start=125
It's on the last page of the thread near the bottom.
Have fun ...
P.S. Yo
I have added (in CVS) the possibilty to do actions on window events (at
least enter/leave). This makes it possible to do the auto shade/unshade
thing without having to modify all border parts and still not having it
work properly.
Example based on winter/borders/PAGER/border.cfg:
__ACLASS __BGN
_
Good time of day/night to List!
Here is my small contribution to e17 - e17 cvs build script.
Adapt variables as needed, run, and in 10 - 15 minutes you will have
fresh e17.
Please note, you will need tcl-devel, fbdevel, tk-devel (and posible
more of these) to successefully compile e17.
Also pleas
Yes , I got your idea , but if is it possible to try it like with rpm based linux system , I hope to get the same with Gentoo asap. ; -)) On Dec 4, 2004, at 11:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:56:07 +0100 Emanuele Cecchi <[EMA
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:56:07 +0100 Emanuele Cecchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> any possibility to find a package gentoo based , I mean a .ebuild of
> the last CVS 0.17.0...???
> I like to try it e contribute to find bug and error
there is very little point in that at t
any possibility to find a package gentoo based , I mean a .ebuild of
the last CVS 0.17.0...???
I like to try it e contribute to find bug and error
P.S. I got Impressed on watching the clip of the demo !!!
---
SF email is sponsored by - Th
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 03:46:14 -0500, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 04 December 2004, at 14:47:41 (+0800),
> Didier Casse wrote:
>
> > Well yeah... as raster said/meant, I used the notation found in the
> > spec file found in cvs. I don't know if it's good or bad. I don't
On Saturday, 04 December 2004, at 14:47:41 (+0800),
Didier Casse wrote:
> Well yeah... as raster said/meant, I used the notation found in the
> spec file found in cvs. I don't know if it's good or bad. I don't
> really care at this point of time since it's not an official release
> anyway. It's a