Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread Michael Jones
Wiki simply means, "what I know is...".  If you know something, and you have something valuable to add to the official documentation, what is so wrong with having to request access? That said, there's nothing stopping anyone from setting up their own site with a wiki focused on e-17, and if s

Re: [e-users] e17 fullscreen problem?

2006-06-19 Thread muzzle
Hi all, once again I am not sure if what I report is a bug or a feature :) I ask e17 not to cover gadgets when maximizing but if I maximize a window that already partially covers a gadget or a shelf the window gets extended to the screen edge, completely covering the gadget. Is this the intended

Re: [e-users] is the water safe?

2006-06-19 Thread Christopher Mayfield
I got the script from here http://omicron.homeip.net/it does pull from the e_modules dir and the misc dir (where engage is located at) On 6/19/06, Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have not seen this script - does it update the "e_modules" repository?On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 12:57 -0500, Ch

Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread radar
quoting the twiki reference manual: > An Important Control Consideration > > Open, freeform editing is the essence of WikiCulture - what makes Wiki > different > and often more effective than other collaboration tools. For that reason, it > is > strongly recommended that decisions to restric

Re: [e-users] is the water safe?

2006-06-19 Thread Andrew Williams
I have not seen this script - does it update the "e_modules" repository? On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 12:57 -0500, Christopher Mayfield wrote: > I have run and completed the latest easy_e17 script. > I have removed the cvs and completely checked it out from > cvs_srv=":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs

Re: [e-users] is the water safe?

2006-06-19 Thread Christopher Mayfield
I have run and completed the  latest easy_e17 script.I have removed the cvs and completely checked it out fromcvs_srv=":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs/e";So I don't know what is going wrong. Please help.On 6/19/06, Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: tried upgrading your modules too?AOn

Re: [e-users] is the water safe?

2006-06-19 Thread Andrew Williams
tried upgrading your modules too? A On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 12:51 -0500, Christopher Mayfield wrote: > The only problem I am having now is the API is version 3 and engage is > still version 2. > > So when I load most ( read all) modules they give the warning > "Module API Error" > "Error initiali

Re: [e-users] is the water safe?

2006-06-19 Thread Christopher Mayfield
The only problem I am having now is the API is version 3 and engage is still version 2.So when I load most ( read all) modules they give the warning "Module API Error" "Error initializing Module:Engage""It requires minimum module API version of 3""the module API advertized be Enlightenment is 2."

Re: [e-users] E16 and E17 trasparency

2006-06-19 Thread Fabian Keil
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:37:27 +0200 Fabian Keil > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > Doh! Apparently the cpu usage had nothing to do with Firefox > > or Sylpheed-Claws, but with the fact that they were hiding > > a shelve which was set to

Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread muzzle
Ok, I'll try to rephrase the question so you all dictionary-definition-nazi will be happy :) Why don't you consider adding an open wiki that requires little or no authentication at all to the enlightenment site-ring? An open wiki that requires little or no authentication is a powerful instruments

Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread Morten Nilsen
Martin Zwickel wrote: > Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled: >> muzzle wrote: Its a controlled WIKI, >>> so it is not a wiki :) >> Err.. A wiki with user controls is still a wiki. > > For reference: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki > > ;) To quote that page; A wiki (IPA: [ˈwiː.kiː

Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread Martin Zwickel
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:36:06 +0200 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled: > muzzle wrote: > >> Its a controlled WIKI, > > > > so it is not a wiki :) > > > >> if you would like to participate, prepare > >> something (or propose mods) and ask for an account to edit the > >> site. (#get-e, Hand

Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread Morten Nilsen
muzzle wrote: >> Its a controlled WIKI, > > so it is not a wiki :) > >> if you would like to participate, prepare >> something (or propose mods) and ask for an account to edit the site. >> (#get-e, HandyAndE, CodeWarrior, or devilhorns) > > A wiki is something that _anyone_ can edit. I can under

Re: [e-users] e-wiki?

2006-06-19 Thread muzzle
On 6/19/06, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/19/06, radar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > are there any ongoing developments on the wiki question? > > a wiki for documentation. > > > > i found a thread from april 2005 on e-devl in the archive. > > http://get-e.org/ > > Its a contr