Re: [e-users] E 0.17.0 issues

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:21:14 +0200 (EET) Robert Krambovitis said: > > From: "Carsten Haitzler" > > To: "Enlightenment users discussion & support" > > Cc: "David Seikel" > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:54:17 AM > > Subject: Re: [e-users] E 0.17.0 issues > > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:38

Re: [e-users] Remove me please from your mailong list

The very headers of the message you sent include this: List-Unsubscribe: , On Thursday 17 Jan 2013 06:16:07 בוריס שלפמן wrote: >

[e-users] Terminology transparency

I have a weird issue. If I run Terminology as root, and go to the Video section in options, and enable Transparency, it works. When I do this as a different normal user, it does not. Is there some weird permissions I need to set somewhere? Thanks, -

[e-users] heavy cpu usage with edje_example.c

Hi, Just started with edje_example.[c,edc] as starting point of a video-asset-managemnt system I need. After the first time the mouse goes over the text, and the text changes colour, I just parked the mouse in the window (not over the text). System fan alerted me to something amiss. Top shows 70%

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

I have the same issue. Tried changing ownership of /usr/bin/terminology, but no change. Gavin. On 17-01-2013 10.50, ich...@amuro.net wrote: > I have a weird issue. If I run Terminology as root, and go to the Video > section in options, and enable Transparency, it works. > When I do this as a d

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gavin Costello wrote: > I have the same issue. > > Tried changing ownership of /usr/bin/terminology, but no change. > > Gavin. > > On 17-01-2013 10.50, ich...@amuro.net wrote: >> I have a weird issue. If I run Terminology as root, and go to the Video >> section in

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, wrote: > I have a weird issue. If I run Terminology as root, and go to the Video > section in options, and enable Transparency, it works. > When I do this as a different normal user, it does not. > > Is there some weird permissions I need to set somewhere? > >

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Arvind R wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >>> wrote: Checked the commits now (cellphone) and 10/11 commits ar

Re: [e-users] [PATCH 1.7.5+svn82296 efl] eina: eina_prefix_new fixed

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Arvind R wrote: >> And that was added to all _DEPENDENCIES variables... which trigger a >> look for that target in the Makefile. That create "some" trouble. I >> revert the change to be able to still build efl. >> > > Wait... Something strange but foll. patch fixe

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Arvind R wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >

Re: [e-users] heavy cpu usage with edje_example.c

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Arvind R wrote: > Hi, > > Just started with edje_example.[c,edc] as starting point of a > video-asset-managemnt system I need. After the first time the mouse > goes over the text, and the text changes colour, I just parked the > mouse in the window (not over the te

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Arvind R wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Arvind R wrote: > O

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Arvind R wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Cedric BAI

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Arvind R wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Arvind R wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >>> wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Cedric BAI

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Arvind R wrote: > The svn82912 Makefile generated by ./autogen --with-crypto=gnutls is at > http://pastebin.com/KgByDs3R I need the src/Makefile, not the Makefile :-) I guess I found what is the problem, I'm testing some stuff here. If possible join us at IRC (f

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Arvind R wrote: >> The svn82912 Makefile generated by ./autogen --with-crypto=gnutls is at >> http://pastebin.com/KgByDs3R > > I need the src/Makefile, not the Makefile :-) > > I guess I found wha

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Arvind R wrote: >>> The svn82912 Makefile generated by ./autogen --with-crypto=gnutls is at >>> http://pastebin.com/KgByDs3R

Re: [e-users] build failure caused by commit 82910/82911

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Arvind R wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Arvind R wrote: The svn82912 Makefile generated by ./autogen --

Re: [e-users] [PATCH 1.7.5+svn82296 efl] eina: eina_prefix_new fixed

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Arvind R wrote: >>> And that was added to all _DEPENDENCIES variables... which trigger a >>> look for that target in the Makefile. That create "some" trouble. I >>> revert the change to be able t

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

The settings for root is exactly the same for my user as I copied the .e folder from my user to root. Still, root has transparancy and user does not. This happens on two systems (One is a VM). Also my user is already in the video group. /dev/dri/card0 is already root:video Not the end of the

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:59:29 -0500 ich...@amuro.net said: > The settings for root is exactly the same for my user as I copied the .e > folder from my user to root. Still, root has transparancy and user does not. > This happens on two systems (One is a VM). Also my user is already in the > video gr

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

I managed to fix this by changing the rendering from OpenGL to Frame Buffer. (Root has OpenGL though, and still transparent) Like I said, not a big deal and I can deal with the Frame Buffer. - Original Message - From: ich...@amuro.net Sent: 01/17/13 07:59 PM To: Enlightenment users discu

Re: [e-users] Terminology transparency

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 21:25:35 -0500 ich...@amuro.net said: > I managed to fix this by changing the rendering from OpenGL to Frame Buffer. > (Root has OpenGL though, and still transparent) Like I said, not a big deal > and I can deal with the Frame Buffer. so a config problem for elementary. nb - g