On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:36:24AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:28:30 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:32:47AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:20:28 +0900 Florian Schaefer
> > > sa
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:32:47AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:20:28 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:08:00AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 17:35:12 +0900 Florian Schaefer
> > > sa
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:08:00AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 17:35:12 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
> > Seems to me to have been good last words this time. ;) So I am running
> > this all day now and I think I did not have a segfault due to procstat
gt;
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:30 AM Al Poole wrote:
> >
> >> Nah
> >>
> >> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, 09:25 Florian Schaefer, wrote:
> >>
> >>> It seems I was once again celebrating to early...
> >>>
> >>
com/gf6AppF1
Am I lately the harbinger of bad news? ;)
Cheers,
Florian
"Florian Schaefer" list...@netego.de – September 7, 2021 4:23 PM
> Excellent. Many thanks. :)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Florian
>
> "Al Poole" nets...@gmail.com – September 7, 2021 4:18
gered by a long command line in terminology while compiling the latest
> >> enlightenment. ;)
> >>
> >>
> >> pastebin.com/Ue03AbmB
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Florian
> >>
> >>
> >> "Al Poole" nets...@gmai
"Al Poole" nets...@gmail.com – September 6, 2021 1:22 AM
> Summoned
>
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 14:12 Carsten Haitzler, wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 11:25:35 +0900 Florian Schaefer
> > said:
> >
> > > OK, the ibox patch seemed to resolve this issue.
021 08:23:12 +0000 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>
> hmmm trying again - for me with asan on i don't see an issue with desklock
> now... ? i tried to change the code to avoid possibly multiple entries in the
> array...
>
> > Hmm, you might not like it (neither do I BTW) but it cra
Hmm, you might not like it (neither do I BTW) but it crashed again on me right
after restarting E a second time.
https://pastebin.com/i1pMSR4d
But still, its definitely more stable than before... ;)
Sorry about that,
Florian
"Florian Schaefer" list...@netego.de – September 6, 20
"Carsten Haitzler" ras...@rasterman.com – September 6, 2021 4:51 PM
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:37 + Florian Schaefer said:
>
> fixed it just now. :)
Hooray, thanks a bunch! :)
With this I am now finally able to also activate/test the modified procstats
module. (Before,
difficult to read way).
Cheers,
Florian
"Florian Schaefer" list...@netego.de – September 5, 2021 2:32 PM
> As I mentioned in my last message of the "E crash with Nvidia" thread,
> in using ASAN I could trigger quite a bit of additional segmentation
> faults. So I dis
"Carsten Haitzler" ras...@rasterman.com – September 5, 2021 10:11 PM
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 11:25:35 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
> > OK, the ibox patch seemed to resolve this issue.
> > Thank you very much! :-)
> >
> > But. As you proposed I started
As I mentioned in my last message of the "E crash with Nvidia" thread,
in using ASAN I could trigger quite a bit of additional segmentation
faults. So I disabled the procstat module for now and went hunting. :-)
On closer inspection it now seems to me that the faults are actually all
due to an
systemd just fine and I am happy for every
unnecessary daemon that I can prevent from cluttering my ps output. So,
anyway, for now I just commented out the callback to the popup. Works
great. ;-)
Cheers
Florian
On 9/5/21 6:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 17:52:09 +0900 Floria
On 9/4/21 4:55 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 11:47:20 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
Raster,
Thanks for the quick reply and help!
OK, so ibox seems to be the culprit. With the module unloaded I was not
able to crash the system. That's quite interesting, on my personal
ma
an open them
again (I know, they appear with Alt+Tab...) and this seems to be the
only scenario that cannot be reproduced by ibar. -- I guess I never
bought into the MacOS style launcher bar. ;-)
Cheers
Florian
On 9/4/21 1:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2021 21:04:35 +0900 Floria
Dear everyone,
so I got a new desktop PC at work and the first thing I did, of course,
was to install Debian sid and enlightenment-git. ;-)
The machine has a Nvidia T600 card and this is where troubles probably
begin. As I kind of need the graphics performance for CAD I went with
the drivers
On 4/5/21 2:54 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 17:40:21 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
On 4/4/21 5:02 PM, Francesc Guasch wrote:
On 04/04/2021 05:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:20:15 +0900 Florian Schaefer
said:
On 4/4/21 5:52 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote
On 4/4/21 5:40 PM, Florian Schaefer wrote:
On 4/4/21 5:02 PM, Francesc Guasch wrote:
On 04/04/2021 05:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:20:15 +0900 Florian Schaefer
said:
On 4/4/21 5:52 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:55:23 +0200 Francesc Guasch
said
On 4/4/21 5:02 PM, Francesc Guasch wrote:
On 04/04/2021 05:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:20:15 +0900 Florian Schaefer
said:
On 4/4/21 5:52 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:55:23 +0200 Francesc Guasch
said:
Hi. I am running Enlightenment 0.24.99
On 4/4/21 12:01 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:20:15 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
On 4/4/21 5:52 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:55:23 +0200 Francesc Guasch
said:
Hi. I am running Enlightenment 0.24.99 24520.
It has always run smooth on my lapton
On 4/4/21 5:52 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:55:23 +0200 Francesc Guasch
said:
Hi. I am running Enlightenment 0.24.99 24520.
It has always run smooth on my lapton, this is a 2005 Toshiba
with 4 GB RAM. It sports an Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics C
On 11.05.18 15:59, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2018 08:43:06 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>> On 10.05.18 12:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 May 2018 09:11:08 +0900 Florian Schaefer
>>> said:
>>>
On 10.05.18 12:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 09:11:08 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> sorry for jumping into the discussion so suddenly. :-)
>>
>> On 10.05.18 01:12, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> [...
Hi everyone,
sorry for jumping into the discussion so suddenly. :-)
On 10.05.18 01:12, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
[...]
>> Ok, so basically you are confirming that
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/GFht7beUYWbobxpP6
>> is a bug in 0.21.11 and that
>
> oh wit. now i see it.. as your mouse goes over "Te
e.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> had this a while back, If I remember correctly it has something to do
> with updated autotools versions.
>
> Running libtoolize in the repository should work :)
>
> Greetings bu5hm4n
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:11:32AM +0900, Florian Sc
Dear enlightenment guys,
since about half a year I cannot figure out any more how to successfully
compile E (neither official releases or from git).
The autogen.sh (or configure) step always end like this:
snip
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd
Done. T1148.
Cheers,
Florian
On 01.04.2014 18:40, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 12:03, Florian Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> thanks for taking your time. I actually tried among the first things
>>
>> rm -rf efl
>> git clone git://git.
On 31.03.2014 21:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 07:33, Florian Schaefer wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> since about three weeks I cannot manage to compile efl from git.
>> It always bails out with the following error message
>&g
Hi everybody,
since about three weeks I cannot manage to compile efl from git.
It always bails out with the following error message
CC lib/eolian/lib_eolian_libeolian_la-eolian.lo
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`../src/lib/ecore_x/ecore_x_version.h', needed by `all'. Stop.
make[2]:
On 19.02.2014 21:53, mh wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 01:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:38:53 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>>
>>> OK, I think I figured out part of the mystery: My E is installed to
>>> /opt/e. Hence also the efre
On 19.02.2014 15:46, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:38:53 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>> OK, I think I figured out part of the mystery: My E is installed to
>> /opt/e. Hence also the efreet dbus service files finished up in this
>>
like firefox, thunderwirds, wicd, my icons are
missing. Can it be that E is giving precedence to SVG files even though
I do not have svg support in E?
Cheers
Florian
On 19.02.2014 09:07, Florian Schaefer wrote:
> Hello David!
>
> On 18.02.2014 21:15, David Seikel wrote:
> [...]
Hello David!
On 18.02.2014 21:15, David Seikel wrote:
[...]
>> I agree, that could be at it's heart. So now the question is how to
>> make E recognize my icon theme. Is there some file in which the
>> available themes are listed? Or according to which kind of black
>> magic is that determined?
>
On 18.02.2014 18:45, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
[...]
>> That's an excellent point. My Icons theme list is empty. I have,
>> however, the gnome-icon-theme deb package installed. What am I missing
>> for it to show up on the icons theme list?
>
> well i suspect that is your core proble
On 18.02.2014 15:44, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:01:22 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>> Hi Cedric!
>>
>> On 18.02.2014 10:51, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> [...]
>>> So you did destroy ~/.cache/efreet/ ? Did you try to manua
On 18.02.2014 15:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:50:58 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>> On 18.02.2014 11:34, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:47:42 +0900 Florian Schaefer
>>> said:
>&
Hi there!
On 18.02.2014 12:39, mh wrote:
[...]
> Another possibility for the missing icons is apparently an efreet bug. I
> filled out a phab bug report on this:
>
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/T870
Yes, seems to be the same thing. I actually knew that you reported this
before and that you w
On 18.02.2014 12:22, P Purkayastha wrote:
[...]
> Latest git has got window focus issues. Stay away from git if you want
> stable software. Most stable is the latest e17 release. I would hold e18
> releases as next in stability.
But then people are also writing "don't use e17, it's old as hell".
Hi Cedric!
On 18.02.2014 10:51, Cedric BAIL wrote:
[...]
> So you did destroy ~/.cache/efreet/ ? Did you try to manually run
> efreet_desktop_cache_create afterward (can be found in
> /usr/lib/efreet/v-1.9/) ? I saw that problem once in the past week,
> and Carsten to, but it did vanish after a re
On 18.02.2014 11:34, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:47:42 +0900 Florian Schaefer said:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> are you honestly complaining about a user trying to give some feedback
>> on the software he loves to use in order to he
t
> software use the *releases*. They are there for a reason.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Florian Schaefer wrote:
>
>> Hello enlightenment,
>>
>> thanks to everybody for their hard efforts in developing this amazing
>> piece of software. Been us
Hello enlightenment,
thanks to everybody for their hard efforts in developing this amazing
piece of software. Been using E for 10+ years now (I guess). Though,
lately it is making my life a bit more difficult (to say the least) and
I am getting to the point where I seriously considered switching t
43 matches
Mail list logo
