ly-white windows whose appearance was defined by the theme (mainly
windows from the Settings panel), saw the similarly theme-defined appearance of
the representations in the pager, and assumed that the representations were
using actual images of the windows in question.
On closer examination, that do
seeing them next to one another is kind of important for actually
noticing them at all.
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.
Every time you let somebody set a limit t
find the
way to do it; it did not occur to me (and probably never would have) that there
literally was no way to do it.
It's already been established that that expectation was incorrect, but in the
situation, I don't think my reaction was entirely unreasonable.
--
On 07/30/2012 06:30 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> http://gopollgo.com/what-linux-desktop-do-you-use-currently
> :)
Me sad. I was hoping to register a vote for E16, but they don't even have it in
the list...
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply because I argue an
On 07/30/2012 12:15 PM, thomasg wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> As suggested in the "feature parity" thread, here's a list of things I want
>> to be able to do in a window manager, which I could do in E16, and which I
>&g
d like to ask about one other change - not
something I myself actively need, but something I've noticed which seems odd.
Fairly late on as far as I recall, E16 added support for "window groups" - that
is, tying multiple windows together so that the same set of flags (e.g.
"sticky&qu
On 07/29/2012 10:59 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:38:56 -0400 The Wanderer said:
>
>> On 07/29/2012 07:50 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> ...I'll cut myself off there before I go off on what could turn out to be a
&
at least not in the same way. I'm not entirely sure which of the
two I'd prefer.
> Only real option I think is to stick text at end, or not reply at all...
>
> Sorry about the mess,
It's not a huge deal, at least not in this context.
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Si
On 07/29/2012 10:41 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:57:03 -0400 The Wanderer said:
>
>> On 07/29/2012 08:09 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> no - there will be no option to turn it off. it will be baked in
>>> &q
On 07/29/2012 07:50 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
[that on 2012-07-29 at 16:59, The Wanderer wrote:]
>> On 07/29/2012 11:12 AM, Wido wrote:
>>> To change how the comp works, go to control panel -> composite -> effects
>>> tab. In styles you ca
On 07/29/2012 08:09 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 10:43:27 -0400 The Wanderer said:
>> I do object in principle to any refusal to allow customization, but I
>> certainly do recognize that practicality must take precedence.
>
> in some ca
s drastic
manual-config-modification ways to achieve the same thing.
I chalked it up to a VirtualBox bug, but if you're seeing it on actual hardware
maybe it isn't.
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply because
On 07/29/2012 11:12 AM, Wido wrote:
> On Sunday July 29 2012 11:43:27 The Wanderer escribió:
>
>> On 07/29/2012 09:35 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> as such e17 has a boat-load of options already and is perfectly usable,
>>> and imho much more us
E17 even as close to my preferred
configuration as I've managed. There are at least two behaviors which show up
when I turn it on (window translucency and a strange visual "size bounce" effect
when switching focus) which I find undesirable, and the latter at least I've
found no way to t
find the vast majority of the
customizability which does already exist?
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.
Every time you let somebody set a limit they start moving it.
-
On 07/16/2012 12:37 PM, Kim Woelders wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:13:27 +0200, The Wanderer
> wrote:
>
>> Where is the appropriate place to report bugs in Enlightenment DR16?
>>
>> The only bug tracker I've been able to find is
>>
>> http:/
fact that there is exactly one person listed
on the "Enlightenment Contact" page for e16, Kim Woelders. I could just report
the bug to that person by E-mail, but that seems like circumventing proper
channels, and I'd prefer not to do that unless there really *are* no proper
channels.
On 07/01/2012 09:34 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> Specifically: clicking, middle-clicking, or right-clicking on the root window
> does not bring up any menus, on the first virtual desktop *only*. On the
> second (and any subsequent, as far as I've tested it) virtual desktop, menus
&g
s, including
1.0.0-3.1 and a self-compiled copy of 1.0.10. I now think this is probably being
triggered by a change somewhere else in the system.
E16 does not create any logs, or output any console messages, that I'm aware of.
How can I track down the cause of this bug? Any ideas what might be
pite the fact that that toggle is set to off. It's
somewhat less aggravating than the other issue, but I'd still rather
avoid it; any ideas what changed, as above, and/or how to fix it?.
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply be
20 matches
Mail list logo
