Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-02 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
1st things first... I'm thinking I owe you all an apology for spouting so rashly! I certainly didn't mean to offend. I do feel strongly about the keyboard/vs/mouse thing because I have difficulty with the mouse. But I regret my choice of words. Please accept my apology, at least enough to re

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-02 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Wido wrote: > BTW, thanks for this great piece of software! you can continue with your > flame ware now =) > This wasn't a flame ware, but just a frank exchange of views. Btw. I read all mails and I also started with computers pre internet age. I'm from generation QL, resp. C64, Atari ST and

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Wido
>> On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:33:53 Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much >> > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't >> > like to spend too much time to set up a DE. E17 is very particular >> > about this. Ju

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:54:05 -0400 P Purkayastha said: > On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:33:53 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much > > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't > > like to spend too much time to set

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread P Purkayastha
On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:33:53 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't > like to spend too much time to set up a DE. E17 is very particular > about this. Just my impressio

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:33:53 +0200 Ralf Mardorf said: > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't > like to spend too much time to set up a DE. E17 is very particular about > this. Just my impressi

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 21:33:43 (+0200), > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > >> your note is fair, but anyway I guess you misunderstood him. OTOH >> don't speak for all FLOSS coders. Some do like to get feedback, also >> negative feedback, that's why there are a lot of

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 22:06:57 (+0400), batden wrote: > "pay someone to make whatever additions/modifications/ > changes/reverts you wish" > > Very good idea! How about hiring a dev to implement utf-8 in Eterm, you > lazy brat... No need. There's already a patch out there for UTF-8 s

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 21:33:43 (+0200), Ralf Mardorf wrote: > your note is fair, but anyway I guess you misunderstood him. OTOH > don't speak for all FLOSS coders. Some do like to get feedback, also > negative feedback, that's why there are a lot of very good WMs/ DEs > for Linux. Ther

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
batden wrote: > "pay someone to make whatever additions/modifications/ > changes/reverts you wish" > > Very good idea! How about hiring a dev to implement utf-8 in Eterm, you > lazy brat... Just a tip, because in the past I also sometimes lost countenance. Ignore sentences similar to "pay someone

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 02:04:54 (-0400), > Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > >> Or to put it another way, Who do I gotta kill to get them to keep >> something like enlightenment_remote around, even if it's really just >> a wrapper written to keep as many thing

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread batden
On jeu., 2009-10-01 at 08:44 -0700, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 02:04:54 (-0400), > Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > > Or to put it another way, Who do I gotta kill to get them to keep > > something like enlightenment_remote around, even if it's really just > > a wr

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 02:04:54 (-0400), Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > Or to put it another way, Who do I gotta kill to get them to keep > something like enlightenment_remote around, even if it's really just > a wrapper written to keep as many things scriptable as possible... Stop whi

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted} (was: emprint:)

2009-10-01 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:22:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > no need to write such a huge mail... it's being removed for good. But > functionality is not going away, nice guys are working on dbus-based > replacement, to be loaded as optional module (so those like you can > load and be happy

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted} (was: emprint:)

2009-09-30 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
no need to write such a huge mail... it's being removed for good. But functionality is not going away, nice guys are working on dbus-based replacement, to be loaded as optional module (so those like you can load and be happy). the replacement provides a shell script around dbus-send and accepts th

[e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted} (was: emprint:)

2009-09-30 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
It would appear that on Sep 30, P Purkayastha did say: > Well, I am not so sure that the e17_setup.sh script is of much use > now. enlightenment_remote has been "retired" and now things are being > moved over to dbus based commands. The current enlightenment_remote is > just a scripted wrapper to

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote commands

2007-03-25 Thread Mirek
englihtenment_remote is one of the best things in E17, please don't remove it. Mirek Slugen Michael Jones napsal(a): > Why are the enlightenment_remote commands removed anyways? Personally, I > like them as it makes it easy to set up scripts to control enlightenment > to do whatever you want. :-

[e-users] enlightenment_remote commands

2007-03-22 Thread Michael Jones
Why are the enlightenment_remote commands removed anyways? Personally, I like them as it makes it easy to set up scripts to control enlightenment to do whatever you want. :-) David Seikel wrote: > You could use enlightenment_remote to enable and disable the modules, > if that's not been removed ye

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 19 May 2006 13:44:20 +0530 B S Srinidhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 17:19 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > you can always just do it with the gui and press "advanced" to set bg's for > > different desktops... :) > > > > But the OP said that everything was *grey

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-19 Thread Danny
On May 19 06, B S Srinidhi thought of the following : > To: E-users > Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:25:32 +0530 > From: B S Srinidhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 > X-BeenThere: enlightenment-users@lists.sou

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-19 Thread B S Srinidhi
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 17:19 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > you can always just do it with the gui and press "advanced" to set bg's for > different desktops... :) > But the OP said that everything was *greyed out* in the GUI. :) Srinidhi. -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) B S Srinidhi - ag

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 19 May 2006 13:25:32 +0530 B S Srinidhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:15 -0400, boneyfrog wrote: > > enlightenment_remote -default-bg-set > > or > > e17setroot - foo > > > > e17setroot is part of e_utils > > > > > > And use the following link to set different

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-19 Thread B S Srinidhi
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:15 -0400, boneyfrog wrote: > enlightenment_remote -default-bg-set > or > e17setroot - foo > > e17setroot is part of e_utils > > And use the following link to set different backgrounds for different virtual desktops: http://www0.get-e.org/Main/News/_articles/53.html :

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-18 Thread boneyfrog
On 5/18/06, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi list, Sorry to bug you again. :) I seem to have gotten the hang of "enligtenment_remote" by now. The only thing I still cannot figure out is how to change the background. Remember in previous posts I said that the "Configuration Panel" option doe

[e-users] enlightenment_remote

2006-05-18 Thread Danny
Hi list, Sorry to bug you again. :) I seem to have gotten the hang of "enligtenment_remote" by now. The only thing I still cannot figure out is how to change the background. Remember in previous posts I said that the "Configuration Panel" option does not allow me to change backgrounds. Everyth

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2005-11-17 Thread Paul Stejskal
Comes with e17 as a CLI tool. Paul On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 23:49 -0500, roland wrote: > Where can one obtain this ? Its mentioned many time on get-e.org but > no mention on where to get it. > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote

2005-11-17 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:49:00 -0500 roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where can one obtain this ? Its mentioned many time on get-e.org but > no mention on where to get it. It is included as part of e17. pgpGgv5cRuE7i.pgp Description: PGP signature

[e-users] enlightenment_remote

2005-11-17 Thread roland
Where can one obtain this ? Its mentioned many time on get-e.org but no mention on where to get it. -- The only constancy is change itself. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Fredrick P. Brooks, Jr. Roland A. Wilcher

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-10-18 Thread Didier Casse
On 10/18/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2005, at 02:21:22 (+0300), > adi wrote: > > > i just want to announce the people who are using erme that they > > should update their version... i have created a current version that > > will be updated more often

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-10-18 Thread Didier Casse
On 10/18/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://caos.nplus1.net/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/e_modules-tclock/ > http://caos.nplus1.net/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/e_modules-calendar/ I like the notation e_modules_foo rather than a stand-alone foo. Good choic

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-10-18 Thread adi
great. i didn't add new things in erme and i think i will not add any other feature in the future (maybe a "save config to file" and "load config from file"). i will just keep it functional with the current e17 cvs. adi On 18/10/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 S

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-10-18 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 29 September 2005, at 02:21:22 (+0300), adi wrote: > i just want to announce the people who are using erme that they > should update their version... i have created a current version that > will be updated more often that the "release" versions. I've created RPM's for erme. You can

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-09-29 Thread Chema Ollés
Chema Ollés wrote: Chema Ollés wrote: adi wrote: Hi, *** unhandled exception in callback: *** Can't call method "pack_start" on an undefined value at /usr/local/bin/erme line 1753, line 189. *** ignoring at /usr/local/bin/erme line 309, line 189 Bye Hi: All works with the new versio

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-09-29 Thread Chema Ollés
Chema Ollés wrote: adi wrote: Hi, I just want to announce you that a new version of erme is ready. it adds wheel and signal bindings options and some bug fixes and i added version count: this is v0.2 You can find it here: http://www.c7obs.net/~adi/projects/perl/ If you will have problems with

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-09-29 Thread Chema Ollés
adi wrote: Hi, I just want to announce you that a new version of erme is ready. it adds wheel and signal bindings options and some bug fixes and i added version count: this is v0.2 You can find it here: http://www.c7obs.net/~adi/projects/perl/ If you will have problems with it please tell me ab

[e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-09-28 Thread adi
Hi, i just want to announce the people who are using erme that they should update their version... i have created a current version that will be updated more often that the "release" versions. here are the changes #- add display option, and don't start # erme is e17 is not found (andreas

[e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2-perl front-end

2005-09-27 Thread adi
Hi, I just want to announce you that a new version of erme is ready. it adds wheel and signal bindings options and some bug fixes and i added version count: this is v0.2 You can find it here: http://www.c7obs.net/~adi/projects/perl/ If you will have problems with it please tell me about them bye

[e-users] enlightenment_remote gtk2 frontend

2005-09-10 Thread adi
Hi, I have added new options to my frontend for enlightenment_remote, beside keybindings it now include mouse bindings general options and winlist options. The desktop tab is not ready yet. The script works with a cvs version 5 days old. Please check you enlightenment_remote options and compare