Hi fellow E ers. Where does one obtain this library ? Build is
complaining about old
version .
checking for libxine >= 1.1.1... Requested 'libxine >= 1.1.1' but
version of libxine is 1.0.0
Thanks.
--
The only constancy is change itself.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Fredrick P. Brooks,
On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 11:50:08 (-0400),
roland wrote:
> Hi fellow E ers. Where does one obtain this library ?
www.google.com
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 11:50:08 (-0400),
> roland wrote:
>
>
>> Hi fellow E ers. Where does one obtain this library ?
>>
>
> www.google.com
>
> Michael
>
>
I agree that this is a bit off-topic, but... although google does turn
up a lot of hits for "lib
On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 19:23:52 (+0200),
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> up a lot of hits for "libxine" (mostly links to distros and all
> sorts of binary packages),
Distro packages. Hmmm...packages one can install on one's distro.
Hmmm... Yes, you're right, very unhelpful.
Silly me. :P
Michae
Yes I found it on sourceforge (surprise) now having fun with dick and
jane finding out
why my pkg-config is hosed up and can't find libxml2. Updating E17 is
always an
adventure. Thats why I am running an old version.
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Michael Jennings wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 28 April
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 19:23:52 (+0200),
> Nikolas Arend wrote:
>
>
>> up a lot of hits for "libxine" (mostly links to distros and all
>> sorts of binary packages),
>>
>
> Distro packages. Hmmm...packages one can install on one's distro.
> Hmmm... Yes, yo
On Sa, 28.04.07 15:06 roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I found it on sourceforge (surprise) now having fun with dick and
> jane finding out
> why my pkg-config is hosed up and can't find libxml2. Updating E17
> is always an
> adventure. Thats why I am running an old version.
>
If you ar
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:28:02 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 19:23:52 (+0200),
> Nikolas Arend wrote:
>
> > up a lot of hits for "libxine" (mostly links to distros and all
> > sorts of binary packages),
>
> Distro packages. Hmmm...packages on
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:15:26 +0200 Nikolas Arend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 19:23:52 (+0200),
> > Nikolas Arend wrote:
> >
> >
> >> up a lot of hits for "libxine" (mostly links to distros and all
> >> sorts of binary packages),
> >>
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:06:22 -0400 roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Yes I found it on sourceforge (surprise) now having fun with dick and
> jane finding out
> why my pkg-config is hosed up and can't find libxml2. Updating E17 is
> always an
> adventure. Thats why I am running an old versio
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:15:26 +0200 Nikolas Arend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>
>> Michael Jennings wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, 28 April 2007, at 19:23:52 (+0200),
>>> Nikolas Arend wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
up a lot of hits for "libxine"
Sorry all did not mean to cause a traffic storm! Figured out I did not
need emotion. Took it
out and got past that problem. Much of the stuff on this machine has
been rebuilt from source
so sometimes happens (to me) . I just thought I would through a
random question out. Bad idea
evidently
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:40:11 -0400 roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Sorry all did not mean to cause a traffic storm! Figured out I did not
> need emotion. Took it
> out and got past that problem. Much of the stuff on this machine has
> been rebuilt from source
> so sometimes happens (t
:-[ - Ok I was being an idiot. I will research more before
bothering you guys. Main trouble I was
having had nothing to do with E. E does not compile well on a machine
with bad memory which
I had. (Memtest86 found it). Again I am sorry. I will take the beatings
from list members now. I
gues
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:09:11 -0400 roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> :-[ - Ok I was being an idiot. I will research more before
> bothering you guys. Main trouble I was
> having had nothing to do with E. E does not compile well on a machine
> with bad memory which
> I had. (Memtest86 fo
On Monday, 30 April 2007, at 11:51:17 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> i know from a user point of view this can be frustrating that we get
> a bit edgy helping out with these things - because we would prefer
> that such prerequisite experience and knowledge of their system is
> handled outside
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 30 April 2007, at 11:51:17 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> so don't take this wrongly - i'm just letting you know that you
>> should always FIRST check your own system and os - keep your house
>> in order and use support mechanism from your distribution o
17 matches
Mail list logo
