No, I did not can gnome2, I removed all my old gnome1 configuration
files and started from scratch. I did this to get redhat 8.0 working
with metacity (good lord that wm blows).
Then I installed apt-rpm and fixed a couple of dependency conflicts.
Then I installed enlightenment 16.5 and fnlib from
Dhruba,
> One word. Gentoo. E and E-cvs (17) couldn't be any easier if you use
> gentoo. I was previously on redhat8 but having made the switch I wonder
> why I ever used anything else.
Well, I secretly am beginning to think the same way. I'm very
dissapointed in RedHat 8.0. and stimulated by
> Ronald,
>
> You removed gnome configuration files? I infer that means you canned
> Gnome2. I gather enlightenment works if you are willing to do that.
>
> Your approach interesting, and your willingness to share it
> appreciated, but it adds to the already long list of quite different
> ways to
Ronald,
You removed gnome configuration files? I infer that means you canned
Gnome2. I gather enlightenment works if you are willing to do that.
Your approach interesting, and your willingness to share it
appreciated, but it adds to the already long list of quite different
ways to install enlight
Hi
I upgraded to 8.0 from 7.3 and I got it to work with E16
First of all, I used the E16 rpms from the Guru or Guru Labs or
something like that.
http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads.html
The other big thing I did was to install apt-rpm and synaptic.
http://freshrpms.net/apt/
Dependency heaven.
Graeme,
The "upgrade" to RH8.0 was also a very bad move for me, for the loss of
functionality in multiple ways, such as conflicing clipboard models,
has made my life miserable.
One loss was the enlightenment desktop. To what extent it can live
with Gnome2 under RH8.0 is debated, and I've now got
For misguided reasons I decided to upgrade my system to rh8.0 (from 7.3)
and I have lost my ability to open a panel in enlightenment.
The panel is still listed in my user application config file but doesn't
appear on the actual panel and won't respond to command line.
I assume this is because o
