Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:41:27 +0800 Wouter van Marle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > beyond pulling stings/favors or hiring a private > > detective to find mandrake - we can do nothing but wait. > > Not wanting to invade someones privac

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:47:43 -0800 Andrew Grimberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:41 +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > beyond pulling stings/favors or hiring a private > > > detective to find mandrake - we c

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:18:02 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Morten Nilsen wrote: > > Mitch Gorman wrote: > > > >> Michael Jennings wrote: > >> > >>> This info would be great...except it's not 1999 any more. > >> > >> > >> Does this mean we can't party anymore? > > > > > > we

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:41:45AM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > This info would be great...except it's not 1999 any more. Hm, I must have been thrown off by the 'Updated' timestamp then... -- Riemer PalstraAmsterdam, The Netherlands [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Morten Nilsen wrote: Mitch Gorman wrote: Michael Jennings wrote: This info would be great...except it's not 1999 any more. Does this mean we can't party anymore? we can still party, just not like it's 1999 far as I could tell from googling around, mandrake last left cepstral and j

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Morten Nilsen wrote: Mitch Gorman wrote: Michael Jennings wrote: This info would be great...except it's not 1999 any more. Does this mean we can't party anymore? we can still party, just not like it's 1999 far as I could tell from googling around, mandrake last left cepstral and

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Mitch Gorman wrote: Michael Jennings wrote: This info would be great...except it's not 1999 any more. Does this mean we can't party anymore? we can still party, just not like it's 1999 far as I could tell from googling around, mandrake last left cepstral and joined something called "di

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Michael Jennings wrote: Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org This info would be great...except it's not 1999 any more.     Does this mean we can't party anymore?

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Monday, 19 December 2005, at 09:27:48 (+0100), Riemer Palstra wrote: > http://www.dirac.org/hackers/ > > "Mandrake, who sometimes goes by Geoff Harrison, is originally from > Atlanta, Georgia. He moved to San Jose, California after his company, > Enlightened Solutions, got bought by VA Linux S

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Paul Stejskal wrote: Oh, I'm lost then. I was referring to the distro. I guess someone changed it. Mandrake the Linux Distro is now Mandriva. http://www.mandriva.com/ Mandrake the person (developer) apparently has disappeared into the ether. Two different entities (a distro and a person).

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:59:21AM +0100, D?nis Riedijk wrote: > Well, where he lived was to be found on his website... The most I can > now find is > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=tammy+mandrake&btnG=Google+Search http://www.dirac.org/hackers/ "Mandrake, who sometimes goes by Geoff Harris

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Dènis Riedijk wrote: On 12/19/05, *Wouter van Marle* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > beyond pulling stings/favors or hiring a private > detective to find mandrake - we can do nothing but wait.

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On 12/19/05, Wouter van Marle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:> beyond pulling stings/favors or hiring a private> detective to find mandrake - we can do nothing but wait.Not wanting to invade someones privacy... but there are quite some people ar

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:41 +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > beyond pulling stings/favors or hiring a private > > detective to find mandrake - we can do nothing but wait. > > Not wanting to invade someones privacy... but there are quit

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > beyond pulling stings/favors or hiring a private > detective to find mandrake - we can do nothing but wait. Not wanting to invade someones privacy... but there are quite some people around here that may want to help. Where (town/country

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:02:07 -0800 Andrew Grimberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 02:26 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote: > > Ok raster, I'm lost as to the reference to Mandrake. Of course it IS > > 2:20 AM hehe. > > Paul > > Mandrake owns the domain name according to whois, ergo

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 18:05 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote: > Oh, I'm lost then. I was referring to the distro. I guess someone > changed it. > Paul > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:52 +1000, David Seikel wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:44:31 -0600 Paul Stejskal > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Oh, I'm lost then. I was referring to the distro. I guess someone changed it. Paul On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:52 +1000, David Seikel wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:44:31 -0600 Paul Stejskal > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mandrake is now Mandriva FYI. > > The person or the distro? I didn't t

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:44:31 -0600 Paul Stejskal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mandrake is now Mandriva FYI. The person or the distro? I didn't think there was any relationship between the two. pgpacyWrz0bP2.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Mandrake is now Mandriva FYI. Paul On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 13:40 -0800, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 13:56 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > > On Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 07:02:07 (-0800), > > Andrew Grimberg wrote: > > > > > Raster, why don't you contact mandrake > > > > Just

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 13:56 -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 07:02:07 (-0800), > Andrew Grimberg wrote: > > > Raster, why don't you contact mandrake > > Just out of curiosity, what caused you to conclude that we hadn't at > least tried to do just that? My apologie

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:53:31 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Grimberg wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 02:26 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote: > > > >>Ok raster, I'm lost as to the reference to Mandrake. Of course it > >>IS 2:20 AM hehe. > >>Paul > > > > > > Mandrake owns the doma

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Andrew Grimberg wrote: On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 02:26 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote: Ok raster, I'm lost as to the reference to Mandrake. Of course it IS 2:20 AM hehe. Paul Mandrake owns the domain name according to whois, ergo you would have to be mandrake to update or sell the domain. So, may

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:44:11 +0900 Jerome Pinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>Hi, >>It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is deadIt will >>come back later or do you have other plan (like superseding byget-e.org) ? >>Thanks > >

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On 12/18/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 07:02:07 (-0800),Andrew Grimberg wrote:> Raster, why don't you contact mandrakeJust out of curiosity, what caused you to conclude that we hadn't atleast tried to do just that? So Mandrake is lost in cyberspace?

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sunday, 18 December 2005, at 07:02:07 (-0800), Andrew Grimberg wrote: > Raster, why don't you contact mandrake Just out of curiosity, what caused you to conclude that we hadn't at least tried to do just that? Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Andrew Grimberg wrote: On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 02:26 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote: Ok raster, I'm lost as to the reference to Mandrake. Of course it IS 2:20 AM hehe. Paul Mandrake owns the domain name according to whois, ergo you would have to be mandrake to update or sell the domain. R

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 02:26 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote: > Ok raster, I'm lost as to the reference to Mandrake. Of course it IS > 2:20 AM hehe. > Paul Mandrake owns the domain name according to whois, ergo you would have to be mandrake to update or sell the domain. Raster, why don't you contact m

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Ok raster, I'm lost as to the reference to Mandrake. Of course it IS 2:20 AM hehe. Paul On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 13:19 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:09:30 -0500 David Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > > > > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > >

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:09:30 -0500 David Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > it will come back.. if and when we can get it back. > > What is limiting the availability of the site? Are resources required? if you have someone on the inside of

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > it will come back.. if and when we can get it back. What is limiting the availability of the site? Are resources required? David --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep throu

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:44:11 +0900 Jerome Pinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hi, > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is deadIt will > come back later or do you have other plan (like superseding byget-e.org) ? > Thanks it will come back.. if and when we can get it back

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:12:29 +0100 schrieb Thomas Kuther: > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:24 +0100 > Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:52:55 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > > > > > Jerome Pinot wrote: > > > > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

[17/12/2005 -- 17:01u] Andreas Volz: > > http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up > > An error has been encountered in accessing this page. > > 1. Server: enligthenment.sourceforge.net I'm probably not the first to reply by now, but read that again. :) Cheers, Tom -- "Es bückt sich der Mann,

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:24 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:52:55 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > > > Jerome Pinot wrote: > > > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is > > > dead > > > > http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up > >

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:52:55 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Jerome Pinot wrote: > > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is dead > > http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up An error has been encountered in accessing this page. 1. Server: enligthenment.sourceforge.net 2.

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Jerome Pinot wrote: It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is dead http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up Cheers, -- Morten :wq --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for pro

[e-users] www.enlightenment.org

Hi, It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is dead It will come back later or do you have other plan (like superseding by get-e.org) ? Thanks -- Jerome Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ N�HY޵隊X���'���u���[��� ަ�k��!���W�~�鮆�zk��C� [EMAIL PROTECTED],a{���,�H��