At present, there is no plan to support ESR 52 beyond the currently
scheduled EOL of June 2018.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 at 11:39 Zachary Kung wrote:
> Has there been any consideration to extending support for Firefox 52 ESR
> beyond the regular schedule based on the number of things that are likely
OpenH264 is used for WebRTC video, not media playback.
As of Firefox 44, h.264 web content is supported through system codecs, if
available.
- Mike
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Jason Jackson wrote:
> Disabling OpenH264 under Plugins in the UI, restarting Firefox, then
> opening the video, i
RC4 support is being removed entirely in Firefox 50, so ESR 52 will not
have any override. Chrome is also removing support for admin enabling of
RC4 (this is happening this month, based on
https://www.chromium.org/administrators/policy-list-3#RC4Enabled )
At this point, RC4 is not considered secu
Hi Norman,
I haven't found any Microsoft documentation to that effect. Jeremy asked
for a link, I'd also be curious to see where it's documented that
applications using their own stores cannot maintain duplicate copies of
certs. It'd make sense that the default Windows stores wouldn't accept
dup
Hi all,
This isn't the right group or thread to debate/attack the overall merits of
Mozilla's CA program. That's a much larger discussion and has a lot of
nuance beyond SSL and the immediate use cases of IT admins. Our goal here
is to understand what IT admins want, and why they want it, so we c
Hi Klaus,
After 43, we no longer sign Windows installers with SHA-1 (as it has been
deprecated). This means XP SP2 clients can't run the installer. In that
case, the path to getting to a secure client is installing an old version
(signed with SHA-1) and then updating (which doesn't use SHA-1) to
To answer one question, that's the only fix listed in the release notes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/38.6.1/releasenotes/
To answer the other, we typically don't provide specific or advance notice
of these unscheduled point releases, as our focus in these situations is on
shipping the fi
Hi Nick,
To answer the on-topic question, ESR 45 and regular 45 are expected to have
the same features. That means that the per-cookie acceptance dialogs will
not be in ESR 45.
Unfortunately, I don't have any recommendations for a replacement add-on.
I'm sure that if the demand is there, somethi
If you're running ESR, you will continue to have that option for the
foreseeable future. If you're not, I believe this thread is well off topic
for this list.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> I didn't say it never happens.
>
> I said it is not nearly the problem that you or M
9 matches
Mail list logo
