NPC/Forscher Polaroid Back for Canon EOS-1 for sale,
mint, $400.00 plus shipping/insurance costs to be
determined. New price is approximately $800.00, so
this is a bargain! Excellent for professional testing
of lighting and camera equipment before committing to
film. Reply privately to [EMAIL P
--- "Chris T. Daida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention something: if I understand
> correctly, matrix
> metering is linked to the focus point, so there's
> greater
> potential for disaster if the flash will not
> illuminate all
> points.
You're mixing apples and oranges. The
- Original Message -
From: "Russell, Sean - RI UK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject: EOS 600 (630)
> Can anyone tell me where I can get a GR20 grip and a remote control for an
> EOS 600 (630)
> I live in the UK and cannot get one
> "Thomas Bantel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a look at both addresses, but all I see are some graphics, can't
> read the text :-( Can you read it and if yes, is it a real explanation
> of evaluative metering?
> ...
> 1) Highest weigh (Sensor zone + immediate neighbors)
> 2) Medium weight
> "Chris T. Daida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only in the sense that the 420EX illuminates all 7 focusing
> points. So in this regard it was made to work very well with
> the Rebel 2000 and Elan 7. The 550EX doesn't do a poor job
> here either--it does at least five. ...
Hi Chris,
Indeed. My
What have people successfully used to protect their EOS equipment while
shooting in the rain?
This may sound a little odd, But i always keep a couple of shower caps in my
billy 550, They work great and being elasticated sit great on the camera
body, With the elast
Dan Honemann wrote:
>
> > This, in addition to the comments I made earlier
> > about manual focusing ease, is the reason I went
> > to the grid screen made with the older technology
> > in my eos 3. Oh, yeah, and also for the grid lines.
>
> Does the same hold true for the 1v (i.e., is there
MD> Hi there,
MD> We have a 'long weekend' in Poland from 28th April till 6th May, for which
MD> I'm going to a place in Austria called St Poelten with a couple of friends.
MD> If there's anyone here who can advise me on photo opportunities in that
MD> area, please e-mail me off-list and write a
Is the RRS mounting plate that works with the Elan II (B38)
also the right one for the Elan 7? (I know I could just
call them, but I'm scared of Bryan!)
--
Curt Hagenlocher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
***
***
* For list instructions, incl
>From: "F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the off-topic question. But, even though I am reading a lot
>of photography books, I have never seen an answer to this question: if the
>frame size is 24mm x 36 mm, then why is it called 35 mm film?
>
>It's
> The R8 may have a nice screen, but the camera is a dog.
> I had one and it died out of the box. Leica replaced
> it with a second one which worked OK.
Unfortunately, Leica doesn't have any fast zooms in the 28-70 range
(they halted production of their 35-70/2.8), and their long glass
costs
> Two reasons. First my slides are all mounted and when I used
> the 100% viewfinder I lost some of the image.
Yes, but thanks to the limited eye relief, you get only 95% coverage
when wearing eyeglasses anyway. :-)
Dan
*
***
***
> This, in addition to the comments I made earlier
> about manual focusing ease, is the reason I went
> to the grid screen made with the older technology
> in my eos 3. Oh, yeah, and also for the grid lines.
Does the same hold true for the 1v (i.e., is there a screen for the
1v that has the o
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:17:00 +0200
> From: Gerard Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: EOS ETTL and Metering mode.
>
> Now to go back to my question: is ETTL also
> linked with the chosen metering mode??
> (Matrix, Partial and Center Weighted)?
Yes. Plus the secret ingredient the selec
"Chris T. Daida" wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Only in the sense that the 420EX illuminates all 7 focusing
> points. So in this regard it was made to work very well with the
> Rebel 2000 and Elan 7. The 550EX doesn't do a poor job here
> either--it does at least five. But still, I'd rather have all
> se
> Fascinating thread. What is it on the Elan 7? I seem to recall 95%?
We get 90% vertical and 92% horizontal.
Kim
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.
Hi there,
We have a 'long weekend' in Poland from 28th April till 6th May, for which
I'm going to a place in Austria called St Poelten with a couple of friends.
If there's anyone here who can advise me on photo opportunities in that
area, please e-mail me off-list and write a few words.
Maciek
"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" wrote:
> Two reasons. First my slides are all mounted and when I used
> the 100% viewfinder I lost some of the image.
> [...]
> Second, I found the 100% viewfinder to be a problem when I used print film
> and
> also when I wanted to print the image. If you are out
Fascinating thread. What is it on the Elan 7? I seem to recall 95%?
I really need to get on top of this because I spend a LOT of time
framing very carefully, and now I think I better start taking notes,
as I don't remember always my exact intentions when viewing stuff back
from the lab. My sens
Julian,
In its last issue (March 2000) EOS Magazine has a good explanation on how
matrix metering is working. Even knowing how it works, you're not aware of
*which* pattern is the algorithm choosing at a given moment. To know that,
you should use an external spot meter, take readings of several
Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> Sorry for the off-topic question. But, even though I am reading a lot of
>photography books, I have never seen an answer to this question: if the frame size is
>24mm x 36 mm, then why is it called 35 mm film? (I could also ask, why is it called
>6x6, when it is act
Gary,
Thanks for the bags of information you've provided. It will take some time
before I digest it, but after first reading I know it WILL help.
Also, thank you Vincente, Julian and Manoj for your info and links to
fill-in flash Web resources.
Maciek
---
Gary Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> It seems to be that you are saying that the 420EX is actually
> more advanced in some ways (with the Elan 7) than the 550EX. Is
> that correct? From reading the Elan 7 manual, it seems that some
> features are available with the 550EX that are not available with
> the
Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> Sorry for the off-topic question. But, even though I am reading a lot
> of photography books, I have never seen an answer to this question: if
> the frame size is 24mm x 36 mm, then why is it called 35 mm film?
It's the width of the film.
Thomas Bantel
*
**
From: Ken Durling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 100% viewfinder (was: EOS 1V )
Fascinating thread. What is it on the Elan 7? I seem to recall 95%?
_
According to the March 2001 issue of Popular Photography, the coverage is 82%, with
0.75x magnification.
According to the Ca
Ray Amos wrote:
> A Pentax marketing rep. (a close personal friend) told me that a Pentax
> engineer told him a few years ago that they could make the focusing
> screen much brighter but as you increase brightness you decrease
> contrast. It's all a compromise. Brighter Screen/Lower Contrast or
--- "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> Two reasons. First my slides are all mounted and
> when I used
> the 100% viewfinder I lost some of the image. Really
> did not make me happy.
> Second, I found the 100% viewfinder to be a problem
> when I used print film
> and
> also
What have people successfully used to protect their EOS equipment while
shooting in the rain?
Gary
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
**
Julian Loke schrieb:
>
>
> Hi Gerard and Thomas,
>
> Did you see the explanation of the Evaluative meter pattern on the
> Canon Japan website?
>
I had a look at both addresses, but all I see are some graphics, can't
read the text :-( Can you read it and if yes, is it a real explanation
of e
Chris Lermanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (in part):
> I'm seeking information on the Sigma AF 24mm f2.8 lens.
...
> 2.Lens Tests /Reviews treat this lens favourably especially in comparison
> to the Canon-at twice the price. (I'm not sure whether its the Mark I that
> was tested)
...
Another vi
Ken Durling wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:31:02 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >but IMO having a
> >digital recording reproduced on an analog medium like vinyl does not do
> >it for me. I much prefer it on digital
>
> Yeah, that's all I really listen to. But I sure do have fond memories
> of those
Tom DelRosario wrote:
> Sorry for the off-topic question. But, even though I am reading a lot of
>photography books, I have never seen an answer to this question: if the frame size is
>24mm x 36 mm, then why is it called 35 mm film?
It's the width of the film. 35mm filmstocks were first use
Hi all,
You can try following site to translate the documents.
http://babelfish.altavista.com/translate.dyn
Hop it Helps,
Thanks,
Manoj
-Original Message-
From: Vicente [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EOS What do y
Dan Honemann wrote:
For my money, the Leica R8 focusing screen is the best combination of
brightness/contrast I've seen (but this is a manual focus camera).
Its viewfinder (with good eye relief) is a joy to use.
I also hear that Bill Maxwell's screens are a nice compromise between
brightness
Chris T. Daida wrote:
Hi Peter,
You're NOT a fan of 100% viewfinder? I think you're the first one
I've ever come across who would rather not see everything in the
frame. How come?
_
Two reasons. First my slides are all mounte
Kenneth M. Sarno wrote:
I bought an EOS 3 and then later a a 1V instead of a second EOS3. ECF is a
controversial subject among the Canon SLR community. Some people swear by it
and claim they use it all the time. Others use it only occasionally. Others
don't use it at all. I am in the latter group
Ken Durling wrote:
What's the slowest shutter speed anyone has been successful using
hand-held with IS on the 28-135?
--
For me it was 1/10th of a second.
*
***
***
Sorry for the off-topic question. But, even though I am reading a lot of photography
books, I have never seen an answer to this question: if the frame size is 24mm x 36
mm, then why is it called 35 mm film? (I could also ask, why is it called 6x6, when
it is actually 5.6 x 5.6?)
Tom D
*
***
From: "Chris T. Daida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Julian Loke wrote:
> As I wrote, I will tolerate the flickering AF assist beam because it
> works when any of the seven AF points are selected. The beam on the
> 430EZ only switches on for the central sensor, and the 550EX only
> switches on for the fiv
> ... any Web resources that discuss fill-in flash?
Hi,
There is a nice illustration of the effect of fill
flash at:
http://kodak.com/global/en/consumer/pictureTaking/flash/flasPho9.shtml
Cheers
Julian Loke
P.S. They even have an EOS Rebel camera on this page:
http://kodak.com/global/en/consume
Can anyone tell me where I can get a GR20 grip and a remote control for an
EOS 600 (630)
I live in the UK and cannot get one anywhere...
Help!
Thanks,
Sean.
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http
Sorry for the OT post folks, but this is the only photo group I'm on.
(Is there one for this kind of question??) Please respond off-list.
A writer friend and I are thinking of collaborating on some essays
w/photos. I would like to know more about how the contract for
something like this usuall
Hi Geoff,
>An EOS IX would do this for you, but then you'd have to put up with the
>small negative. There are so few different APS films, that there isn't
>much point in switching anyway. APS slide film is like UFOs: Everybody
>is talking about it, but I'll be damned if I've ever seen any!
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:58:45 +0200
> From: Pawel Nabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: EOS D30 Questions (for D30 owners)
>
> 1) Why can you set 'film speed' on a digital camera?
> What does this effect?
All sensors have a base speed and allow for extra
amplification, resulting in somew
Jani Patanen wrote:
>
> Ken wrote:
>
> > OK, back on topic now, folks!
> >
> > What's the slowest shutter speed anyone has been successful using
> > hand-held with IS on the 28-135?
>
> at the wide end (not at 28mm, but close to it): half a second!
1/4 sec at 50mm, see:
http://www.shadowcatche
I'm seeking information on the Sigma AF 24mm f2.8 lens.
1. As the current one is called Super Wide Series II is this lens clearly
different to the model it supposedly replaced- performance ,specs.etc.?
2.Lens Tests /Reviews treat this lens favourably especially in comparison
to the Canon-at twic
Ken wrote:
> OK, back on topic now, folks!
>
> What's the slowest shutter speed anyone has been successful using
> hand-held with IS on the 28-135?
at the wide end (not at 28mm, but close to it): half a second!
At 135mm 1/6 seconds.
*
***
*
Julian Loke wrote:
> Compare how well implemented AF assist was on the EOS 1000FN:
> If I want flash or red-eye reduction or AF assist light, I pull up
> the popup flash head. To disable it, I simply push down the popup
> flash head! No need for CFs or bulky hotshoe add-ons :-)
That IS interest
>Hi there everyone,
>
>I am one of I think a large pack of silent readers on this group, who don't
>contribute very often but find a lot of information exchanged on the forum
>very valuable and highly instructive. Thanks to all those who share their
>knowledge and experience (and their first-rate
"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" wrote:
> While I liked the 1V I remain with the EOS-3 as my prime 35mm SLR because
> I like ECF and am not a fan of 100% viewfinder (my presonal preference).
Hi Peter,
You're NOT a fan of 100% viewfinder? I think you're the first one
I've ever come across who would
Ken wrote:
What's the slowest shutter speed anyone has been successful using
hand-held with IS on the 28-135?
Ken,
I've used it at 1/4s "successfully" (if you enlarge the pic a lot, you see
it's a bit soft). In any way, it's a wonder. I've used it even at 1/2, but
there was no hope (I'm a coffe
> ECF is the reason I bought an EOS 3 instead of an EOS 1V,
> I start to be very disapointed.
I bought an EOS 3 and then later a a 1V instead of a second EOS3. ECF is a
controversial subject among the Canon SLR community. Some people swear by it
and claim they use it all the time. Others use it o
Hi,
Recently I bought an EOS 3 to replace my EO 50E,
I Think the camera has a roblem with ECF.
When i stand still, on the same light condition if i look
at one of the 45 AF "captor" an press on the shutter button
many times (lets say 2 times a second) it is not always the same "captor"
that bec
--- Maciej_Dróbka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there everyone,
>
> And now -- to the point. Fill-in flash has been one
> of the most vague photographic terms that I've seen
> discussed on various occassions. I've seen things
> like 'use your flashgun for a nice fill-in' or 'a
> little bit o
54 matches
Mail list logo
