10x for comments on the lens.
This really a sharp lens. I'm glad with it.
What I've noticed is that this lens is very fast. I don't have
super-high-tech nuclear chronometer installed in my brain so I can't find
any speed difference between my fiends f/1.4 USM, or 24-85 USM or any other
USM lens an
Hello David!
This lens can outperform any consumer zoom with its optical quality, yes,
its noisy, but still it is god, no - it is great.
>
> Hello everyone,
> Today I've got my 50mm f/1.8 II. Yes, I know it's cheep,
> plastic, noisy,
*
***
*
David Magradze wrote:
>
> Today I've got my 50mm f/1.8 II. Yes, I know it's cheep, plastic, noisy,
> low-end...but it was only I could permit myself.
Don't feel bad at all. It's a great lens.
> 3. Are all 50mm f/1.8 II lenses so noisy, or it's only my "problem"?
Nope. It's everyone's. But just
David Magradze wrote:
>
> 1. At which large aperture I will get sharpest pictures? Someone told me
> that at f/2.5 pictures are very sharp.
Yes, I'd say starting from f/2.8 you will not notice much difference in
sharpness, although it's still a little better at f/8 according to Photodo
(whateve
Hello everyone,
Today I've got my 50mm f/1.8 II. Yes, I know it's cheep, plastic, noisy,
low-end...but it was only I could permit myself.
I have couple of questions to ask (I'm sure You've discussed it before, so
sorry for bothering):
1. At which large aperture I will get sharpest pictures? Someon
