At 07:33 PM 01/29/2001, you wrote:
>I think I've seen photos taken with such set up (by looking at the
>reflection in the model's eyes), but because of the relatively lower output
>power from the ring flash, I suspect the useful range will not be great.
The "look" goes in and out of fashion, but
>Ring Flash for Portraits?
The same question crossed my mind a couple of times.
Knowing that the closer the flash is from the lens-fp axis, the stronger the
red-eye effect I kept on wondering what will be the result with such a ring
flash? Martian eyes?
I read once in a mag (PP) that using a r
In a message dated 1/29/01 6:04:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I am looking at the EOS 3 and there would appear to be two RF models
available 1: the ML3 and 2: MR 14EX.
I am wondering weather one could use a ring flash as a front fill-in for
portrait work but as t
>
> I am wondering weather one could use a ring flash as a front fill-in for
> portrait work but as the MR costs 359 sterling it would be cheaper to buy
a
> second 55EX.
I think I've seen photos taken with such set up (by looking at the
reflection in the model's eyes), but because of the relative
Can anyone tell me weather or not the ring flash has any value other than
for use with a macro attachment.
I am looking at the EOS 3 and there would appear to be two RF models
available 1: the ML3 and 2: MR 14EX.
I am wondering weather one could use a ring flash as a front fill-in for
portrait w
