Re: Vs: EOS Is that it?!?

2001-02-13 Thread Nick Taylor
Jaakko Pitkäjärvi wrote: [snip] > Daniel's good site is ruined by information worth nothing what comes > to new products. Can't understand why to write just nonsense all the > time and malinform persons that have no access to EOS-mail-list for > latest true stories... Hello Jaakko, I, for one,

Vs: EOS Is that it?!?

2001-02-13 Thread Jaakko Pitkäjärvi
- Original Message - From: Daniel ROCHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:42 AM Subject: Re: EOS Is that it?!? > From: Jaakko Pitkäjärvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hello Jaakko ! > > > Daniel's good site is ruined by information worth nothi

Re: Vs: EOS Is that it?!?

2001-02-13 Thread Robert Meier
--- Jaakko Pitkäjärvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > these new Canon products have been announced at > PMA: > > > > New Canon EF 70-200/2.8L IS lens, ($2200) > > New Canon EOS-1D body: digital version of the > EOS-1v > > New Canon EF 400/4.0 DO IS lens, (priced at > $5750) > > New telecon

Vs: EOS Is that it?!?

2001-02-13 Thread Jaakko Pitkäjärvi
- Original Message - From: Daniel ROCHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Re: EOS Is that it?!? > From: Bill Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hello Bill > > > It looks like it was Daniel Rocca again, if one follows the link.

Vs: EOS Is that it?!?

2001-02-13 Thread Jaakko Pitkäjärvi
- Original Message - From: Bill Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:03 PM Subject: Re: EOS Is that it?!? > It looks like it was Daniel Rocca again, if one follows the link. Please > note that the 70-200 IS news is incorrect, it was qui