On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:16 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 15. 12. 20 v 16:44 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> > Or just the no-cost RHEL developer subscription?
>
> From Terms and conditions:
> https://developers.redhat.com/terms-and-conditions
>
> ```
> Examples of such violations include, but ar
Hi Jos, seems fine to me; I'd say go for it!
-Jeff
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:58 PM Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received a user request to update eccodes, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850633
>
> Currently EPEL7 and EPEL8 have version 2.14 that was published by
> upstre
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:59:57PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
>
> > Let me know your thoughts and concerns about moving forward with this.
>
> +1 here and thanks for making epel a safer place.
>
>
+1, thanks!
-Jeff
_
What's the backstory on this? It mostly looks good to me. Is there a way to
propose edits off-list (editing this in an email doesn't seem great).
-Jeff
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
> Vision
>
>
> Visions are for people who stand on mountains.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Effective immediately I am stepping down from EPSCo, I am unable to give it
> the time it deserves.
>
>
Thanks for all your work, Dennis!
-Jeff
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@l
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any objections to me doing either of these?
>
>
I think this is great, and thanks for your work on it.
-Jeff
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
> We will be having a meeting of the EPEL Steering Committee on 2015-04-17
> at 17:00:00 UTC in Freenode IRC channel #epel
>
I just realized this is an hour later than I thought it was (I had the old
time on my calendar). I won't
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On 14 April 2015 at 08:03, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
>
>> According to the initial agreement among interested parties, EPSCO was
>> going to end the first term on March 31st, 2015.
>>
>> With th
According to the initial agreement among interested parties, EPSCO was
going to end the first term on March 31st, 2015.
With that in mind, what's the status of the policy questions outlined here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas What remains to be
done from the policies and t
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> I no longer have access to nor need for EL5 and EL6 boxes so I have
> orphaned the following packages in those branches:
>
> abcde
> bash-completion
> ccache
> colordiff
> reptyr
> rpmdevtools
> tomcat-native
>
> ...and I've also orphaned ja
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> The macros.epel file is missing?
>
> kevin
>
>
Looks like it didn't make it in the latest patch, but here it is from the
first patch:
--
diff --git a/macros.epel b/macros.epel
new file mode 100644
index 000..fb4413f
--- /dev/nu
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > +%epel %{?rhel}%{!?:rhel:7}
>
> typo alert ^^ (in the second part), but hopefully you get the idea.
>
> Or, if you'd rather not depend on %rhel macro, and just hard-code to 7,
> that
> would be fine too.
>
The approach
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>
> ping, any comment or objection?
>
> I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in case
> anyone was waiting for implementation details.
>
>
Seems like it can't hurt much to have such a macro defined by the
epel-relea
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
>- EpSCO governance.
> - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?)
>
> This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable.
>-
> - Replacement of any exiting members (replacement by formal v
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On 29 August 2014 16:15, Michael Stahnke wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> The governance structure will be a short term organization to set up
>>> policies and procedues in place for continual maintenance of EPEL. The term
>>> of the committee
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Karanbir Singh
wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 11:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > We will be holding our weekly EPEL meeting tomorrow at 1600 UTC.
> >
> > Topics will be:
> >
> > 1) EPEL-7 moves out of Beta
> > 2) EPEL.
> > 3) Open Flood.
>
> I have another meet
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Kevin and I working to move epel 7 out of beta
Great, thank you!
-Jeff
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, this basically came about because we moved from a steering
> comittee to a "whoever shows up at meetings and does work decides" and
> then everyone except me stopped showing up to meetings. ;)
>
> I'm happy to try and reach some con
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael Stahnke
wrote:
> >
>
>
> Smooge thanks for the write-up.
>
> Great points are being brought up by all parties here.
>
> I think I'm +1 on a second repo that moves faster and can be incompatible
> with the right type of announce-list. (maybe even put the u
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We've switched over to using the final rhel7 content finally.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> As you can see from the epel7 build tag in koji:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=259
>
> we have the following rhel7 channels that we
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Simone Caronni
wrote:
>
>
> Aren't we already using CentOS for EPEL 5 and 6 in the koji/mock
> buildroots? 32 bit aside, what is the difference for 7?
> This has been dealt nicely so far.
>
No, EPEL has always used RHEL for builds.
-Jeff
___
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 05:54:43 -0500
> Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>> Is this proposal acceptable to the EPEL devs and contributors?
>
> I think this is a reasonable way forward for now.
>
Yes, +1 to this.
-Jeff
___
epel-devel mailing list
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>
> Doh! The original email in this chain was a copy and paste/stupid user
> error on my part. No, I no longer get that issue with the llvm build and
> like Kevin pointed out, just waiting worked.
>
> But I sent two emails this month with very
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> Yes, waiting did work for that issue (
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-February/195156.html),
> but this is another issue and appears to that the building of the source
> .rpm isn't working properly for some reason.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I created an EL6 branch of qt-creator and submitted the build on koji (
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6401118 ), but it
> hasn't shown up the testing repo yet? Is there something I need to do to
> get that to happen?
>
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> done https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7
>
>
Thanks Dennis, for setting all this up! Where does this leave us now? Can
people start submitting builds already, or are we still missing some
infrastructure pieces?
-Jeff
Just the right time if you ask me! How do we get the ball rolling?
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> RHEL7 beta is out - too early to start thinking about EPEL7?
>
> --
> Orion Poplawski
> Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Offi
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, could you remind us again of the various interactions of the
> versions? (or is there a doc on it?)
>
> Ie, of 2.6, 2.7, 3.0, which versions clients can talk to which versions
> servers?
>
I'm not sure about 2.7 -> 3.0, but for the sake of
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> The gearmand package was recently orphaned for all branches. I've
> taken over maintenance, and Blake and I intend to push the latest
> upstream gearmand (1.1.8) to Fedora and EPEL 5 and 6.
>
>
Sounds great to me, and thanks for the heads-up!
29 matches
Mail list logo
