[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 repo error for distribution-gpg-keys?

On 10/22/22 00:22, Troy Dawson wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:44 AM Nick Howitt via epel-devel wrote: On a server I don't use very often, I am trying to update mock-core-configs with yum and I am seeing: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL RHEL 9 mirror error

On September 23, 2022 10:00:49 PM GMT+03:00, Nick Jahn wrote: >Brand new server, followed guide from EPEL setting it up, first added repo to >server. > >Tried your suggestion, and I get this. > >bash: cd: /etc/yum/repos.d/: No such file or directory > Troy said "yum.repos.d" wolfy --

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On 6/5/22 03:47, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 10:52 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I was only thinking of CAN we do it.  I wasn't thinking SHOULD we

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 packages still in epel-testing

On 4/21/22 00:48, Troy Dawson wrote: It was pointed out that we have 160 packages in epel7-testing. 10 of those are legitimate updates that are less than a week old. Then there are 3 that are less than a year old. And then there are 147 that are between 2 and 6 years old. (Yep, there are none

[EPEL-devel] Re: Dependency issue hwinfo/libx86emu

On 4/7/22 05:11, Gemneye via epel-devel wrote: I have recently received dependency issues with a `yum update` on a CentOS 7 server.  I believe they are both epel packages (hwinfo and libx86emu) It looks like hwinfo wants to upgrade to hwinfo.x86_64 0:21.68-1.el7 from hwinfo.x86_64

[EPEL-devel] Re: question about review process excemptions for Python 3

On 1/24/22 00:20, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 23.01.22 um 10:57 schrieb Nick Howitt via epel-devel: A bit o/t, but will you be updating the python2-certbot-dns-* packages as well? All certbot plugins currently in EPEL 7 will transition to Python 3 as well (all packages will be in a single

[EPEL-devel] Re: rpmconf does not install on Amazon Linux 2 with EPEL7

On 6/1/21 8:21 AM, Danie de Jager wrote: It was trivial to compile from src RPM I was just wondering in this scenario, should Amazon compile rpmconf and add this package to their base? Or is there something else I'm not considering? I'd say it's up to Amazon to include the package in their

[EPEL-devel] Re: rpmconf does not install on Amazon Linux 2 with EPEL7

On 5/31/21 4:03 PM, Danie de Jager wrote: Hi, There is an unfortunate dependency problem when trying to install rpmconf from EPEL 7 that is used by Amazon Linux 2. Who can I contact to try and resolve the dependencies? Is the spec file maintained by EPEL or the developer? [root@server]# yum

[EPEL-devel] Re: Version of gcc in EPEL7

On 1/4/21 5:19 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: Hi, last week I have compiled the first alpha release of LyX 2.4 in copr. As I have been doing in other cases I have built the package in EPEL 7 and 8, together with the supported Fedora versions and rawhide. The code only failed in EPEL 7. In a

[EPEL-devel] Re: Broken EPEL updates due to Centos 7.6 delay?

On 11/27/18 3:45 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 11:00, Christopher wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:12 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 01:03, Christopher wrote: Anybody know what's going on

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

On 05/19/2018 06:17 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: On 05/18/2018 04:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: It would be nice if both architectures could be made available in the epel wine package I'll say it one more (last) time: epel(*) cannot build i686 packages (*) In it's

[EPEL-devel] Re: incompatibility issue for mate-desktop

On April 25, 2018 6:46:44 PM GMT+03:00, Fred Liu wrote: >OK. Then I am thinking about brunch and merge into OS’s iso once there >is >package update in EPEL. EPEL always tracks the latest RHEL minor release. If you decide to ignore all the security risks associated with the

[EPEL-devel] Re: ansible1.9 package

On 11/03/2017 05:40 PM, Ricardo J. Barberis wrote: El Viernes 03/11/2017 a las 12:09, Stephen John Smoogen escribió: OK how can we better explain this in the future? There seems to be some sort of misunderstanding that EPEL is giving the same guarentees as a paid for product from Red Hat. I

[EPEL-devel] Re: Question about using yum to install epel package on CentOS 7

On 07/18/2017 05:02 PM, Claessen, Paul wrote: Thanks for the reply! Would you, by any chance, have a suggestion on how to avoid this behavior? Is there anything I can do so that when I do a yum install, it will always, and only, install the latest version of a certain package? you will need

[EPEL-devel] Re: Question about using yum to install epel package on CentOS 7

On 07/18/2017 04:07 PM, Claessen, Paul wrote: While testing a script that installs packages, I ran into a situation where I seem to have to (or can) install the epel package twice in a row (and get different results). This may actually be a package handler (rpm, yum) issue, but it only

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 i686

On 05/11/2017 02:08 PM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: On 2017-05-11 11:58, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: Hi, I am interested to build an EPEL for i686 to support my CentOS 7 AltArch i686 setup. I know you are following RHEL's roadmap and

[EPEL-devel] Re: Epel arm

On 05/23/2016 07:43 AM, Nicolas Repentin wrote: Hello I'm not sure if it is the good place to ask, I think the question might have been asked but not recently. Is there an epel repo for armv7 somewhere? Or is it planned to have one? Not yet a repo but on its way: closest thing you can

[EPEL-devel] Re: related question / off topic - EPEL Proposal #1: Rechartering

On 02/19/2016 04:16 AM, ~Stack~ wrote: [snip] 1. Packages will never disappear. [They don't disappear from Fedora 12 even if it is archived.. ] To my understanding we never made this promise. We should try and communicate why it's NOT something we promise. Could you elaborate on this

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL5 version of epel-rpm-macros in testing

EPEL wolfy, former maintainer of rpmlint for EL5 and EL6 -- Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 IT managerNoBug Consulting SRL A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>

Re: [EPEL-devel] transitioning packages to EPEL version

On 10/16/2014 02:32 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hello, On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 11:40, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: I have previously installed backuppc 3.1.0 from centos 5 testing. The package is now not maintaned by centos anymore. EPEL have BackupPC version 3.3.0,

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

On 09/05/2014 12:49 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of the idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new brand. Maybe we can just tie it to the upstream-of-Fedora -- 13 months, rolls with each Fedora release, etc.? It would look

Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

On 12/19/2013 12:57 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Morten Stevens mstev...@fedoraproject.org wrote: My preference is also el7, because we have also a Packager and Vendor tag to declare these packages as Fedora EPEL (and not rhel) packages. Why should these 2 tags