On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> Is nobody concerned with the implications (or irony?) of building an open
> source project on top of a proprietary platform?
I assume you mean RHEL. RHEL is not a proprietary platform — it's silly to
call it that. Look at Rocky Linux
Am 15.12.20 um 18:02 schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:43:28PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Notable problem if we switched from CentOS to RHEL in Mock configuration
is that several build dependencies will be missing. RHEL 8 doesn't e.g.
ship e.g. the *-devel packages (this probl
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Regarding the recent announcement of CentOS 8 flipping to CentOS Stream -
> What will be the configs for building EPEL 8?
> I mean mock configs? And I ask as Mock maintainer - because I have no idea.
I don't think you need to panic
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:16 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 15. 12. 20 v 16:44 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> > Or just the no-cost RHEL developer subscription?
>
> From Terms and conditions:
> https://developers.redhat.com/terms-and-conditions
>
> ```
> Examples of such violations include, but ar
Dne 15. 12. 20 v 16:44 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> Or just the no-cost RHEL developer subscription?
From Terms and conditions:
https://developers.redhat.com/terms-and-conditions
```
Examples of such violations include, but are not limited to ...
* using the services provided under the Program
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 10:45, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:30:21AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Honestly I don't know how to deal with regular EPEL-8 development after
> > this. EPEL is going to add an epel-next which they would ask for
> additional
> > targets in
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 12:02, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:43:28PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Notable problem if we switched from CentOS to RHEL in Mock configuration
> > is that several build dependencies will be missing. RHEL 8 doesn't e.g.
> > ship e.g. the *-devel
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:43:28PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Notable problem if we switched from CentOS to RHEL in Mock configuration
> is that several build dependencies will be missing. RHEL 8 doesn't e.g.
> ship e.g. the *-devel packages (this problem, if I understand it correctly,
> is slo
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 4:44:58 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:30:21AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Honestly I don't know how to deal with regular EPEL-8 development after
> > this. EPEL is going to add an epel-next which they would ask for additional
> >
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 4:44:58 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:30:21AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Honestly I don't know how to deal with regular EPEL-8 development after
> > this. EPEL is going to add an epel-next which they would ask for additional
> >
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:30:21AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Honestly I don't know how to deal with regular EPEL-8 development after
> this. EPEL is going to add an epel-next which they would ask for additional
> targets in mock for. However that does not fix building against the regular
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 05:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Regarding the recent announcement of CentOS 8 flipping to CentOS Stream -
> What will be the configs for building EPEL 8?
> I mean mock configs? And I ask as Mock maintainer - because I have no idea.
>
> Are we going to build EPEL 8 against Ce
On 12/15/20 11:00 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Regarding the recent announcement of CentOS 8 flipping to CentOS Stream - What
will be the configs for building EPEL 8?
I mean mock configs? And I ask as Mock maintainer - because I have no idea.
Are we going to build EPEL 8 against CentOS stream? Wha
13 matches
Mail list logo